Tournaments > Tournaments

Tournament #1012, Zar Roper 4

<< < (3/4) > >>

Sensei:
Really don't care, Kradie. Joined just because seeing how hard you struggle to get 6th player :)
Still commenting on this just because it's keeping me amused.
So - let's do it once again:

I lost with 1 worm - other guy got proceeded.
I won with 1 worm - rematch needed.

There's 0% of circumstances where this logic can be applied as right thing to do. And yet, you're trying to.

Kradie:
Can a moderator please close this tournament? Because it is over. Thanks.

Sensei:


Get one.

spleen17:
Both the ZaR scheme rules AND the tournament rules specify two worms. Obviously the game is void. Try putting one worm per player in Komo's next Twyst tournament and see what he does.

TheKomodo:
When "ending" a Tournament I have 2 options "Close" and "Finish", this time I chose Finish because it was successful(kinda).

I am just going on based on what i've read but...

Kradie, if you let another game with 1 worm each stand without rematch, but not Sensei's game, regardless of the reason, this is indeed double standards, personally I don't believe "didn't want to delay the Tournament" as a valid excuse, either everyone follows the rules, or nobody does.

I was going to enforce a rematch of Twyst Final because they didn't wait for me to stream it, but at the end of the day I swallowed my pride and thought, these guys are the ones playing, they are the people who have made this as successful as it is, sure people tune in to hear me talk utter bollux on Twitch, but I do it for THEM and the community, I want to make them happy, so i'll give them some leeway, and you know what, the world didn't end...

On the other hand, people, PLEASE read the rules and do your best to play by the rules, if the MOD wants 2 worms each, then just play with 2 worms each, or at the very least ask permission 1st...

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version