Cups
March 28, 2024, 04:43 PM

Game #216247, reported by Husk, Viewed 1934 Time(s)

Grenade Wars
Group 2
January 02, 2017, 11:24 AM
Winner
Husk
Finland TdC bf dS
Gained 5 points
Loser
Slayer
Russian Federation BoM
Lost 5 points
  

Game Rate
Not rated yet
Players history
4 - 1
Information Cup name: : #909: Grenade Wars
Cup scheme(s):
Original by TOMAT, remix by XanKriegor/Slayer

Game Result: 1:0
Watch The Game Replay(s):
Downloaded 263 time(s).
Game Map(s)

Perkele Deathmatch by Perkele
2880 x 1040, PNG, 13.98 KB, Downloaded 74 time(s)

Game Chat(s)
[HuskyTdC] we wuda, but no xD
[HuskyTdC] hf m8s
[`Pn`XanKriegor] 3 way would not work
[HuskyTdC] forts mapa goom xD
[`Pn`XanKriegor] i did not thouught on that
[goom] what scheme? i cant see weapons
[HuskyTdC] but grenade wars scheme =P
[goom] aha
[goom] never really played it
[goom] strong nades i take it :)
[`Pn`XanKriegor] winner should report as usual
[Slayer] so what format we play?
[HuskyTdC] round robin I guess
[goom] LG nade, anchored worms. anything else?
[`Pn`XanKriegor] 1v1, three games again
[HuskyTdC] there's 5 teles
[goom] worm sel?
[HuskyTdC] no, and random worm order
[goom] looks like a pretty fun scheme. thank god you didnt have to place 48 worms on a fort, i was about to leave :D
[HuskyTdC] lmfao xD
[HuskyTdC] yeah i wuda uninstall wa if that happened xD
[goom] hopefully placement in the future will be better implemented
[HuskyTdC] hmmmm, yeah, like if u hold shift and place ur worm, it would place all ur team's worms there
[HuskyTdC] example
[goom] yeah for sure.
[HuskyTdC] would be cool for darts
[HuskyTdC] and rr
[goom] host could just click once and drop
[HuskyTdC] yeahhh
[HuskyTdC] weee xD
[goom] and for forts you could take a couple mins with x8 worm sel to relocate
[goom] per side i mean
[HuskyTdC] yeah or randomly place on like 500 pixel radius of the first worm xD
[goom] or within a drawn box. there are a lot of options
[HuskyTdC] yeah
[HuskyTdC] like indimask uses colour from map
[`Pn`XanKriegor] forts suck balls, non plays it
[`Pn`XanKriegor] xDD
[HuskyTdC] well :D it would be good for other schemes aswell.... hmmmm... or not xD
[HuskyTdC] ctf! xD
[HuskyTdC] gooooal
[HuskyTdC] nice
[Slayer] )
[`Pn`XanKriegor] xD
[HuskyTdC] hmmm xD
[goom] vn
[HuskyTdC] t
[goom] you need some clusters :D
[HuskyTdC] but 1-1 plops xD
[HuskyTdC] hmmm :D
[goom] ns
[Slayer] t
[HuskyTdC] xD n
[HuskyTdC] ae almost
[goom] this Bo# ?
[Slayer] 1
[HuskyTdC] bo1000 :D
[HuskyTdC] i hope it doesn't go to 500-500 draw xD
[goom] Bo17 w/Antisink
[HuskyTdC] rotfl xD
[goom] that will be quick
[HuskyTdC] we need nanas for that shit xD
[HuskyTdC] hmm
[HuskyTdC] that's not how u boomrace
[goom] oh fp too?
[goom] LOL
[HuskyTdC] woah
[HuskyTdC] bl
goom [bl]
[HuskyTdC] i am piled up xD
[goom] no skip dang
[goom] xan you play this much?
[HuskyTdC] looooooool xD
[goom] lololol
[goom] WSE if he hadnt plopped
[goom] these are golden nades or what power?
[goom] fuse
[HuskyTdC] wheeew
[HuskyTdC] vnt
[goom] no mine?
[goom] sec/duds?
[HuskyTdC] duds yes
[goom] aha
[Slayer] wtf
[goom] chase!
[Slayer] no telecow
[HuskyTdC] ok
[HuskyTdC] any other rules?
[goom] goal
[goom] nice throw
[`Pn`XanKriegor] thats was just cheap tele
[goom] slayer we need to do hysteria sometime :D
[goom] ^^
[`Pn`XanKriegor] 2v2 worms
[goom] this TUS or separate ?
[HuskyTdC] tus cup
[goom] ah
[HuskyTdC] gg
[goom] vns
[HuskyTdC] thx
[goom] that win :P
[Slayer] bad tele
[Slayer] you shouldn't

Author Topic: Game #216247, reported by Husk  (Read 1982 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Husk

Game #216247, reported by Husk
« on: January 02, 2017, 11:26 AM »
13:18:58 Slayer: telecow victory
13:19:05 HuskyTdCs: who telecow?
13:19:18 Slayer: you did it 2 times
13:19:23 HuskyTdCs: nope
13:19:26 Slayer: teleporting under me
13:19:28 HuskyTdCs: yes?
13:19:32 Slayer: where I can get you
13:19:35 HuskyTdCs: u can still kill my worm without huring ur own
13:19:40 Slayer: I can't
13:19:42 HuskyTdCs: sure u can
13:19:43 HuskyTdCs: shotgun
13:20:02 Slayer: being on the roof I couldn't get your worm
13:20:10 HuskyTdCs: that's ur fault lol
13:20:16 HuskyTdCs: choose ur hide more smarter =)

Offline XanKriegor

Re: Game #216247, reported by Husk
« Reply #1 on: January 02, 2017, 11:31 AM »
Bad hide + cheap tele. You may agree on a rematch any time, i would advice you to make it, and to make it bo3.

Offline Husk

Re: Game #216247, reported by Husk
« Reply #2 on: January 02, 2017, 11:37 AM »
bad hide + cheap tele?

bad hide yes slayer

cheap tele? here u pull the cheap card, hiding on top is cheap in roper but if ur opponent bluff u call him, slayer bluffed me thinking i wud play with his strings, look at this shit he write in ag:

13:26:43 Slayer: I put my worms on the roof
13:26:48 HuskyTdCs: yeah
13:26:51 HuskyTdCs: it's a bad tactic m8
13:26:54 HuskyTdCs: someone can just tele under u
13:27:04 Slayer: you could put your worm on another roof

that looks like some dictator shit to me, why am I forced to tele on roof just because my opponent teles on roof?

i asked for rematch he said no... soooo |:


Offline Hurz

Re: Game #216247, reported by Husk
« Reply #3 on: January 02, 2017, 12:22 PM »
scheme sucks?  :D

Offline Slayer

Re: Game #216247, reported by Husk
« Reply #4 on: January 02, 2017, 12:26 PM »
His teles were definitely dirty. But rules don't give us detailed description of telecow. I just explained suomi that such teles are bad manners or something unfair. No rematch of course. I am not a girl and don't show everybody private talkings.
« Last Edit: January 02, 2017, 12:46 PM by Slayer »

Offline XanKriegor

Re: Game #216247, reported by Husk
« Reply #5 on: January 02, 2017, 12:34 PM »
We dont do such things indeed but Husk does not play GW with us, neither rules pointing out that such behavior is wrong, so we cant expect him tp play just as we do.

Offline Peja

Re: Game #216247, reported by Husk
« Reply #6 on: January 02, 2017, 12:48 PM »
Yay noob cups ftw

Offline xSniperx

Re: Game #216247, reported by Husk
« Reply #7 on: January 02, 2017, 12:49 PM »
wtf is all this moaning shit about being dirty ?

If it;s not against the rules and the best way to win why the hell would you expect him not too.

you're argument is basically " he only won because he didn't play the way i wanted him too" .
haha winning would be easy all the time if this is the case.

Offline Chelsea

Re: Game #216247, reported by Husk
« Reply #8 on: January 02, 2017, 01:23 PM »
1. shit cup
2. shit scheme
3. Husk didn't do anything against rules
4. Husk ftw ae! :)

Offline Sensei

Re: Game #216247, reported by Husk
« Reply #9 on: January 02, 2017, 01:35 PM »
Slayer doesn't like losing, that's a known fact.
But to call out Husk like this, it's just unnecessary.

Offline Slayer

Re: Game #216247, reported by Husk
« Reply #10 on: January 02, 2017, 02:05 PM »
Slayer doesn't like losing, that's a known fact.

Strange statement. Can you show me someone who like losing? May be you?)) Don't confuse your prejudice with the attempt to set people on the right path

Offline Sensei

Re: Game #216247, reported by Husk
« Reply #11 on: January 02, 2017, 02:24 PM »
Ofc I don't like it. But some guys just don't like it more, and you're one of them. Why not admit it and move on?

Husk is probably fairest player out there on wnet.
With you, on the other hand, I've had numerous ugly situations. So, what's wrong with sharing an opinion..


Offline Slayer

Re: Game #216247, reported by Husk
« Reply #12 on: January 02, 2017, 02:38 PM »
I recommend you to refrain from personal assessments because if someone decides to give you an assessment, then you risk to hear the mass of unflattering words. So watch yourself and let us to solve our misunderstanding. I think Husk doesn't need any lawyer here.

Offline Sensei

Re: Game #216247, reported by Husk
« Reply #13 on: January 02, 2017, 02:59 PM »
Ye ye, np, you're so great :)

Btw, Xan, as a cup moderator, why you suggesting rematch if winner didn't do anything wrong? What kind of mockery is this?

Ok, moving on.

Offline Slayer

Re: Game #216247, reported by Husk
« Reply #14 on: January 02, 2017, 03:13 PM »
Rematch was suggesting by Husk, before Xan. As you don't play grenade wars scheme you don't know that we don't teleport our worms closely to opponent's worm in a way when we can shoot him, and opponent can't get our worm like it was in this game. But you should notice next:
- I didn't start this topic
- I didn't ask for rematch
- I tried to explain this nuance with teleports