The Ultimate Site of Worms Armageddon

Cups and Tournaments => Cups and Tournaments Games Comments => Topic started by: barman on March 04, 2014, 09:00 PM

Title: Game #165224, reported by ZexorZ
Post by: barman on March 04, 2014, 09:00 PM
Quote
UC`Wormgamer`dS..``UC`ZxrZ`DOS``: no...
UC`Wormgamer`dS..``UC`ZxrZ`DOS``: torch
UC`Wormgamer`dS..``UC`ZxrZ`DOS``: or sg
UC`Wormgamer`dS..``UC`ZxrZ`DOS``: xd
``UC`ZxrZ`DOS``..UC`Wormgamer`dS: too late
UC`Wormgamer`dS..``UC`ZxrZ`DOS``: bow push to much
``UC`ZxrZ`DOS``..UC`Wormgamer`dS: pinned chat
UC`Wormgamer`dS..``UC`ZxrZ`DOS``: torch was better ;]
``UC`ZxrZ`DOS``..UC`Wormgamer`dS: now i have pinned chat
UC`Wormgamer`dS..``UC`ZxrZ`DOS``: okz
UC`Wormgamer`dS..``UC`ZxrZ`DOS``: ae
``UC`ZxrZ`DOS``..UC`Wormgamer`dS: XD

I don't like this. This was supposed to be a 1v1 match.
I'd rather like play against one player instead of a pair discussing strategy with a pinned chat.
The game was close enough for any unfair advantage like this having a chance to be crucial.
Title: Re: Game #165224, reported by ZexorZ
Post by: MeTonaTOR on March 04, 2014, 09:13 PM
Quote
UC`Wormgamer`dS..``UC`ZxrZ`DOS``: no...
UC`Wormgamer`dS..``UC`ZxrZ`DOS``: torch
UC`Wormgamer`dS..``UC`ZxrZ`DOS``: or sg
UC`Wormgamer`dS..``UC`ZxrZ`DOS``: xd
``UC`ZxrZ`DOS``..UC`Wormgamer`dS: too late
UC`Wormgamer`dS..``UC`ZxrZ`DOS``: bow push to much
``UC`ZxrZ`DOS``..UC`Wormgamer`dS: pinned chat
UC`Wormgamer`dS..``UC`ZxrZ`DOS``: torch was better ;]
``UC`ZxrZ`DOS``..UC`Wormgamer`dS: now i have pinned chat
UC`Wormgamer`dS..``UC`ZxrZ`DOS``: okz
UC`Wormgamer`dS..``UC`ZxrZ`DOS``: ae
``UC`ZxrZ`DOS``..UC`Wormgamer`dS: XD

I don't like this. This was supposed to be a 1v1 match.
I'd rather like play against one player instead of a pair discussing strategy with a pinned chat.
The game was close enough for any unfair advantage like this having a chance to be crucial.

As you can see, i didnt asked for help, but he preffered to help me
Title: Re: Game #165224, reported by ZexorZ
Post by: LeTotalKiller on March 04, 2014, 09:17 PM
What the.

Edit: Analyzed the situation; asking for 3rd-party, non-UC advice for more fairness.
Title: Re: Game #165224, reported by ZexorZ
Post by: Triad on March 05, 2014, 09:13 AM
Hmm i dont see anything worth to complain imo. I see that WG told some stratregy in a single round but you won that round anyway. Or maybe its about your principles i guess.
Title: Re: Game #165224, reported by ZexorZ
Post by: barman on March 05, 2014, 09:22 AM
WG told some stratregy in a single round but you won that round anyway
Does that mean that people are allowed to cheat as long as the opponent is winning?
Title: Re: Game #165224, reported by ZexorZ
Post by: VoK on March 05, 2014, 09:25 AM
Lol nice sheeet !!! :D
Title: Re: Game #165224, reported by ZexorZ
Post by: MeTonaTOR on March 05, 2014, 10:36 AM
WG told some stratregy in a single round but you won that round anyway
Does that mean that people are allowed to cheat as long as the opponent is winning?

Does i cheated??
Title: Re: Game #165224, reported by ZexorZ
Post by: LeTotalKiller on March 05, 2014, 12:40 PM
Well, it is undeniable WG did something he shouldn't, due to not knowing; he's regretting it now, and he promised not to do it ever again.

However, yes, I've considered that Zexorz didn't ask, which makes him slightly less at fault (I mean, if he asked, I'd most likely have delete the game), and that barman won the round (don't get me wrong: what happened shouldn't have happened and that's for sure, there again, but removing that round would penalize barman, who only was a victim in this cheating situation).

Now, this is the first time I see this happening in any of my cups, and WG promised not to do it ever again, as I explained him why it was bad; now though, if you want to be perfectly sure this won't happen in the future, I'm not against disallowing spectators. I'm really sorry that happened. :(
Title: Re: Game #165224, reported by ZexorZ
Post by: Triad on March 05, 2014, 01:15 PM
WG told some stratregy in a single round but you won that round anyway
Does that mean that people are allowed to cheat as long as the opponent is winning?
Ah sorry didnt know this was considired as cheat, my bad.