You always encourage ppl to say something and give their opinion and ideas on darts. But whenever someone do it, you just can't agree and must convince them everything is perfectly fine with this scheme. All I've asked was a poll and you just try to bury my thought about mulligans.
Where exactly are you pulling this information from? This is precisely the reason why I can't be assed anymore, people accusing me of dumb shit like this when all i've ever done is take peoples opinions/ideas and either act on them if I instantly believed they were good enough or debate if I have doubts, I challenge everything I possibly can to make sure the right decisions are being made not for some sort of personal ego boost.
How can you know something is the right option if you don't try to find flaws with it? How can you believe someones idea or opinion is worthy if they don't even have the patience or intelligence to defend it and chase it?
In my last post I actually asked you for some evidence:
Why would you think they would vote to cancel it, has anyone talked about cancelling it?
Because you said:
honestly think that fair number of members would agree to cancel mulligans in seasons ahead.
Ofc all members were for it, but that was two seasons ago. Poll won't do any harm, you guys just gonna see is everyone still ok with having them implemented in darts. I'm probably most active darter in last 2 months, and must say thay I enjoyed in dsts more without mulligans than now. Is that really a problem?
I am trying to find out if you are the only person who feels this way or not at the same time as defending a feature I like.
I never once said it was a problem, I never once insulted you, stop acting so offended.