i didnt remember how was that, but found this in the scheme explanation: "3 Fouls means a lose by default."
in this case, we (nW) "won" the game, because Creps cowed a lot. but its not important for me to report as we would've won it, just to be removed.
btw i dont know why ppl play classic league if they dont know the default rules of every scheme there...
I checked the replay. At the last "sitter", the grenade sat still for only 0.16 seconds, so technically it wasn't really a sitter, altough very close. Together with the first sitter and 2 shots which weren't reaimed (I'm not sure that's all, I fast-forwarded the replay) but also didn't do any damage that makes 3 fouls (at least). I think WC took all the penalties they were supposed to.
I'd like to see some other opinions before we take any action. That was surely a stressful game! :)
Quote from: Rok on June 18, 2010, 06:01 PM
I'd like to see some other opinions before we take any action. That was surely a stressful game! :)
thats sure! :-X
and sry WC, i didnt say this before u've reported, just didnt think about it when we were playing. thats why i dont want it to be reported as a win for us.
It's games like this that made me quit BnG in the first place :( especially creps' shots. Thouson, before you play BnG again with a clan mate who doesn't yet know it, please explain the rules before the game.
2 sitters, 2 penalties. Game should stand imo.
only one of them was sitter technically, but there are some reaim fouls too,
The shots which weren't reaimed (there we're two, IIRC) didn't hit and they skipped a turn after at least one of them.
Game stands.