well played mate. but 4 aquasheeps in one game, and all for you.. .thats a bit too hard. but it was close in the end :)
Something in Chicken's scheme is starting to smell ;)
Quote from: MonkeyIsland on April 07, 2015, 04:45 AM
Something in Chicken's scheme is starting to smell ;)
He doesn't Play at league scheme, but at other one... ::)
Quote from: Chelsea on April 07, 2015, 09:01 AM
Quote from: MonkeyIsland on April 07, 2015, 04:45 AM
Something in Chicken's scheme is starting to smell ;)
He doesn't Play at league scheme, but at other one... ::)
atleast he doesnt avoid,
Quote from: Chelsea on April 07, 2015, 09:12 AM
Quote from: pizzasheet on April 07, 2015, 09:05 AM
Quote from: Chelsea on April 07, 2015, 09:01 AM
Quote from: MonkeyIsland on April 07, 2015, 04:45 AM
Something in Chicken's scheme is starting to smell ;)
He doesn't Play at league scheme, but at other one... ::)
atleast he doesnt avoid,
like you ::)
Interesting talk we have here :)
Quote from: MonkeyIsland on April 07, 2015, 04:45 AM
Something in Chicken's scheme is starting to smell ;)
oh yeah, last game he had Nanas, and this game sheeps... next time i bring my own scheme :D
Quote from: MonkeyIsland on April 07, 2015, 04:45 AM
Something in Chicken's scheme is starting to smell ;)
Yep, Chicken's scheme gives slightly more aquas, missiles, pigeons and bananas. I would keep probabilities for those weapons the same as in TUS scheme.
increasing the probability of SD weapons decreases of chances of only 1 player having a SD weapon... something to keep in mind =)
But the chance for that scenario is really low. So better both players having more chances to get a lategame weapon. Its more fair, imo. 1 or 4 aquas, doesnt matter. Its just an overkill and with the standard scheme the same like having one aqua and your opponent zero.
Alltogether, better odds for both picking a lategame weapon means better balance.