Nah man at this point I just assumed you're being arrogant or trolling/baiting, there's no way that a "healthy grown up adult" can be that ignorant about currency.
The currency is not the same, the minimum wage in Brazil is low and I make below the minimum like millions of other brazilians. I just made a quick search and the cheapest decent full hd monitor costs around 65-70% of the mininum wage salary.
Here in Brazil we have the culture of spliting the purchase in credit card as much as we can.. endless debts to survive.
I know that you have no obligation to know my financial situation or that of my country, but before you continue to insist on measuring the reality of the world with your own metric, I warned you that we didn't share the same reality.
Anyway, I'm done with this subject.
QuoteAnyway, aside the whole buying/not buying better monitor thing - it's like I make a post about banning Inter scheme because some people will surely have advantage playing it on 1024x768, while I'm using 1920x1080. Wouldn't you find that laughable?
Yes I would.
But this argument doesn't make any sense because you can switch back to any lower resolution at any time, unlike someone with a smaller monitor who can't use a higher resolution. It's not as if you're being hardware forced to use your monitor's native resolution, you are just choosing to do it...
My point is, this scheme is the only one in the entire classic league that benefits someone solely because they have a better hardware, but not only that, it happens because by default the maps used go beyond the native map size initially established by the game (1920x696), we are going against the main patterns of the game and rules that is fundamental to other all round schemes, big rr/tower is just unnatural to be placed there, all other schemes you can demand default map size by rule.
Btw I think this is the longest post I have ever written here