Poll
Sounds much better than hal xd
any league that is not rr only can be called luck league xD
:D source?
EDIT: Oh and i voted for more hal ;D
you're bad on a scheme => call it a shitty scheme
lmao f@#! logic
Not necessarily. From rope schemes I like roper the most, even though I suck at it in someway :)
Infact this is how you should behave with. :)
Question: HAL #4
Option 1: Awesome league. Start it! 
Option 2: I don't wanna play this league, it sucks 
Title: Request for HAL #4
Post by: Xrayez on February 15, 2014, 06:23 PM
Post by: Xrayez on February 15, 2014, 06:23 PM
Classic and TEL has recently started, so lets play HAL #4? :'(
As HHC's claimed, here's RnR (https://www.tus-wa.com/schemes/scheme-1017/) scheme to consider for this league
And as Triad's stated, here's Petrolia (https://www.tus-wa.com/schemes/scheme-433/) scheme :)
We can make 4th season experimental one aswell
As HHC's claimed, here's RnR (https://www.tus-wa.com/schemes/scheme-1017/) scheme to consider for this league
And as Triad's stated, here's Petrolia (https://www.tus-wa.com/schemes/scheme-433/) scheme :)
We can make 4th season experimental one aswell
Title: Re: Request for HAL #4
Post by: MonkeyIsland on February 15, 2014, 06:30 PM
Post by: MonkeyIsland on February 15, 2014, 06:30 PM
The reason I haven't, is because people didn't ask enough. So far it is you and Chelsea.
Title: Re: Request for HAL #4
Post by: Triad on February 15, 2014, 07:02 PM
Post by: Triad on February 15, 2014, 07:02 PM
Well then, its now Xrayez, Chelsea and me. :P
Title: Re: Request for HAL #4
Post by: Chelsea on February 15, 2014, 07:25 PM
Post by: Chelsea on February 15, 2014, 07:25 PM
lmfao !! i alreadya sked you 763476434946437 times about start HAL xDDD it should be anough for you ;D
Title: Re: Request for HAL #4
Post by: HHC on February 15, 2014, 07:32 PM
Post by: HHC on February 15, 2014, 07:32 PM
I'll ask about it too then. What about HAL MI? ;D
1 more request then: Add RnR to it. It's basically aerial but then with ropes. Same idea, but a totally different game.
Would make the league more versatile/interesting imo.
1 more request then: Add RnR to it. It's basically aerial but then with ropes. Same idea, but a totally different game.
Would make the league more versatile/interesting imo.
Title: Re: Request for HAL #4
Post by: Triad on February 15, 2014, 07:40 PM
Post by: Triad on February 15, 2014, 07:40 PM
Also petrolia maybe.
Title: Re: Request for HAL #4
Post by: Chelsea on February 15, 2014, 07:44 PM
Post by: Chelsea on February 15, 2014, 07:44 PM
(http://up-ship.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/no-3.jpg)
hysteria and aerial are anough ! eventualy add petrolia !
hysteria and aerial are anough ! eventualy add petrolia !
Title: Re: Request for HAL #4
Post by: HHC on February 15, 2014, 08:30 PM
Post by: HHC on February 15, 2014, 08:30 PM
have you tried it chels?
It suits much more.
Petrolia is kinda uhh *dum*?
3rd scheme would be nice imo.
It suits much more.
Petrolia is kinda uhh *dum*?
3rd scheme would be nice imo.
Title: Re: Request for HAL #4
Post by: Xrayez on February 15, 2014, 08:41 PM
Post by: Xrayez on February 15, 2014, 08:41 PM
RnR is not even supposed to be rope scheme (that wasn't my original idea), but rope is hard to use in RnR, and it adds more risky/luck/fun moments to BnG-like scheme :)
Title: Re: Request for HAL #4
Post by: avirex on February 16, 2014, 07:28 AM
Post by: avirex on February 16, 2014, 07:28 AM
how about a roper only league??
only 2 schemes are roper + w2roper...
anyone else wanna sign this petition ?
only 2 schemes are roper + w2roper...
anyone else wanna sign this petition ?
Title: Re: Request for HAL #4
Post by: Csongi on February 16, 2014, 10:55 AM
Post by: Csongi on February 16, 2014, 10:55 AM
Quote from: avirex on February 16, 2014, 07:28 AM
how about a roper only league??
only 2 schemes are roper + w2roper...
anyone else wanna sign this petition ?
Sounds much better than hal xd
Title: Re: Request for HAL #4
Post by: Statik on February 16, 2014, 11:14 AM
Post by: Statik on February 16, 2014, 11:14 AM
roper + rr is bett0r
Title: Re: Request for HAL #4
Post by: Husk on February 16, 2014, 11:23 AM
Post by: Husk on February 16, 2014, 11:23 AM
how about league with shopper, abnormal, minemadness and ctf
Title: Re: Request for HAL #4
Post by: Xrayez on February 16, 2014, 11:38 AM
Post by: Xrayez on February 16, 2014, 11:38 AM
Offtopic, there's nothing to do here for you, rope fellowz :-X :)
Title: Re: Request for HAL #4
Post by: Chelsea on February 16, 2014, 11:55 AM
Post by: Chelsea on February 16, 2014, 11:55 AM
Shoppa + team17 = luck league xd
Title: Re: Request for HAL #4
Post by: Husk on February 16, 2014, 12:02 PM
Post by: Husk on February 16, 2014, 12:02 PM
t17 is luck xDDDddddd
that is why random has 82.42% win percentage xDD
that is why random has 82.42% win percentage xDD
Title: Re: Request for HAL #4
Post by: avirex on February 16, 2014, 05:24 PM
Post by: avirex on February 16, 2014, 05:24 PM
just because a scheme is lucky, does not mean a really great player can not over come the luck...
i like t17 husk, but face the facts.. its a luck scheme...
i like t17 husk, but face the facts.. its a luck scheme...
Title: Re: Request for HAL #4
Post by: Statik on February 16, 2014, 06:14 PM
Post by: Statik on February 16, 2014, 06:14 PM
the only scheme without luck is rr, play vs yourself and there will be a big chance of a draw game, unlike t17 or hyst :D
Title: Re: Request for HAL #4
Post by: Husk on February 16, 2014, 06:18 PM
Post by: Husk on February 16, 2014, 06:18 PM
if t17 would be about luck I think thw win percentages would be closer to 50% =)
Title: Re: Request for HAL #4
Post by: avirex on February 16, 2014, 06:37 PM
Post by: avirex on February 16, 2014, 06:37 PM
just because a scheme has a large luck factor, does not mean its as lucky as flipping a coin...
no one is saying there is not skill needed in t17...
but if i get an earth quake, and a nuke... i dont care how good you are, my chances of winning are more then triple..
and collecting both a nuke, and a quake is luck, no?
there is skill involved in t17, but its a luck scheme, there is no defending that husk ;p just face it!!
no one is saying there is not skill needed in t17...
but if i get an earth quake, and a nuke... i dont care how good you are, my chances of winning are more then triple..
and collecting both a nuke, and a quake is luck, no?
there is skill involved in t17, but its a luck scheme, there is no defending that husk ;p just face it!!
Title: Re: Request for HAL #4
Post by: Husk on February 16, 2014, 06:45 PM
Post by: Husk on February 16, 2014, 06:45 PM
sure =) every scheme has luck, so I agree with that lol
Title: Re: Request for HAL #4
Post by: Husk on February 16, 2014, 06:51 PM
Post by: Husk on February 16, 2014, 06:51 PM
Quote from: Chelsea on February 16, 2014, 11:55 AM
Shoppa + team17 = luck league xd
any league that is not rr only can be called luck league xD
Title: Re: Request for HAL #4
Post by: avirex on February 16, 2014, 10:30 PM
Post by: avirex on February 16, 2014, 10:30 PM
well t17 has highest luck factor...
;D
roper is a high luck factor as well.
;D
roper is a high luck factor as well.
Title: Re: Request for HAL #4
Post by: Husk on February 16, 2014, 10:51 PM
Post by: Husk on February 16, 2014, 10:51 PM
Quote from: avirex on February 16, 2014, 10:30 PM
well t17 has highest luck factor...
:D source?
Title: Re: Request for HAL #4
Post by: avirex on February 17, 2014, 12:14 AM
Post by: avirex on February 17, 2014, 12:14 AM
the source is everyones w:a experience....
out of all the classic schemes, which would you say is highest luck factor?
ahhh nvm.. lets end this discussion, we are off topic, i dont wanna get a warning... nvm husk!
out of all the classic schemes, which would you say is highest luck factor?
ahhh nvm.. lets end this discussion, we are off topic, i dont wanna get a warning... nvm husk!
Title: Re: Request for HAL #4
Post by: Husk on February 17, 2014, 10:55 AM
Post by: Husk on February 17, 2014, 10:55 AM
I'd say t17 xD
Title: Re: Request for HAL #4
Post by: Xrayez on February 17, 2014, 08:12 PM
Post by: Xrayez on February 17, 2014, 08:12 PM
Are 14 votes enough to start the season, yo?
Title: Re: Request for HAL #4
Post by: TheWalrus on February 17, 2014, 08:19 PM
Post by: TheWalrus on February 17, 2014, 08:19 PM
Quote from: Husk on February 16, 2014, 10:51 PMRandom's win% that you cited earlier in t17, 82%, is the worst out of all of his schemes. For a dude that is great at default schemes, that just screams that the scheme is more luck based than the rest.Quote from: avirex on February 16, 2014, 10:30 PM
well t17 has highest luck factor...
:D source?
EDIT: Oh and i voted for more hal ;D
Title: Re: Request for HAL #4
Post by: Husk on February 17, 2014, 10:50 PM
Post by: Husk on February 17, 2014, 10:50 PM
yeah we all agree, t17 has highest luck
I was just saying that any league scheme except rr can be called lucky
I was just saying that any league scheme except rr can be called lucky
Title: Re: Request for HAL #4
Post by: VoK on February 18, 2014, 04:40 PM
Post by: VoK on February 18, 2014, 04:40 PM
But only rr can be caled shit scheme !!! xD
Title: Re: Request for HAL #4
Post by: Triad on February 18, 2014, 05:16 PM
Post by: Triad on February 18, 2014, 05:16 PM
Quote from: Husk on February 17, 2014, 10:50 PMMaybe it seems not skill-based, but Darts is not luck scheme too. In darts, basically you have to find correct swing for the map and maintain that swing in every single worm. If you do that in a map, noone cant beat you there , no matter how much lucky shots your opponent did.
I was just saying that any league scheme except rr can be called lucky
Title: Re: Request for HAL #4
Post by: Husk on February 18, 2014, 07:04 PM
Post by: Husk on February 18, 2014, 07:04 PM
lmfao vok, yeah true triad
Title: Re: Request for HAL #4
Post by: Xrayez on February 18, 2014, 07:50 PM
Post by: Xrayez on February 18, 2014, 07:50 PM
Seems like ratio of willing to play this league to those who won't, will be stable at 2/3 :)
Title: Re: Request for HAL #4
Post by: Sbaffo on February 19, 2014, 10:58 AM
Post by: Sbaffo on February 19, 2014, 10:58 AM
Quote from: VoK on February 18, 2014, 04:40 PM
But only rr can be caled shit scheme !!! xD
you're bad on a scheme => call it a shitty scheme
lmao f@#! logic
Title: Re: Request for HAL #4
Post by: Xrayez on February 19, 2014, 11:08 AM
Post by: Xrayez on February 19, 2014, 11:08 AM
Quote from: Sbaffo on February 19, 2014, 10:58 AMQuote from: VoK on February 18, 2014, 04:40 PM
But only rr can be caled shit scheme !!! xD
you're bad on a scheme => call it a shitty scheme
lmao f@#! logic
Not necessarily. From rope schemes I like roper the most, even though I suck at it in someway :)
Title: Re: Request for HAL #4
Post by: Sbaffo on February 19, 2014, 05:12 PM
Post by: Sbaffo on February 19, 2014, 05:12 PM
Quote from: Xrayez on February 19, 2014, 11:08 AMQuote from: Sbaffo on February 19, 2014, 10:58 AMNot necessarily. From rope schemes I like roper the most, even though I suck at it in someway :)Quote from: VoK on February 18, 2014, 04:40 PM
But only rr can be caled shit scheme !!! xD
you're bad on a scheme => call it a shitty scheme
lmao f@#! logic
Infact this is how you should behave with. :)
Title: Re: Request for HAL #4
Post by: MonkeyIsland on February 19, 2014, 06:23 PM
Post by: MonkeyIsland on February 19, 2014, 06:23 PM
Activated HAL #4.
Title: Re: Request for HAL #4
Post by: HHC on February 20, 2014, 04:54 PM
Post by: HHC on February 20, 2014, 04:54 PM
cheers :)