An idea i've been discussing with a few folks who seem to agree, even ZorroX thought it was a good idea.
If the score comes to 2:2, make the last pick mutual, or, make the first pick mutual and the winner gets to pick the 2nd scheme, and then they rotate turns until it's won.
TFL should perhaps be Bo7 or more since the variety of schemes is so much more vast.
As Gabriel said recently, all you need is to master 3 schemes and you could destroy TFL. For example by picking Darts, Forts, Golf alone, since i've never played TFL much and the activity is low i'm very confident i'd have at least a 50% win ratio and enough games played to reach the Playoffs, if I was active enough the other 5+ schemes i'm pretty good at and if I manipulated my picks well enough I could probably achieve 1st place in a Season, then just pick those 3 schemes which reflect my BnG skills and the fact the only other person who really plays Darts well being Hurz.
There are several players around who could achieve the same thing with relative ease. The point is, whoever gets 1st pick is highly likely to win
When I was watching ZorroX Vs Hurz in the final and the score was 2:2 knowing ZorroX was picking Mole Shopper, I left as watching ZorroX slaughter someone who doesn't even enjoy the scheme isn't very enjoyable as the ultimate climate of a Season.
Absolutely not having a go at ZorroX for picking Mole Shopper, though can you see the point about it being an absolute letdown as a fan of spectating competitive Leagues and enjoying the big events? It was like listening to a dance song with a long buildup and disappointing drop:
I thought it was fun watching ZorroX Vs danie in Mole Shopper because at least they both enjoy it and it could go either way.
TFL is awesome, fixing Playoffs to be more balanced would be a great move instead of being pretty much whoever is highest ranked in the Season and has mastered 3 schemes.