About AHK

[avirex]

im hardly trying to get you mad...

but the way you are saying its not good proof seems suspicious, im obviously not the only one to think that...

the point is, if your old replays detect cheating... and your little warmer replay here you have does not.. your a cheater...


if you none of your replays detect cheating, and you know they wont.. then you have nothing to worry about, so stop acting suspect

[darKz]

How about you stop accusing me out of the blue then? Do we have a deal?

The only thing I said is that this whatever-it-is isn't 100% accurate and may mislead people to think someone is a cheater when he isn't.

[Immortal]

With the help of Entuser I will analyze all the replays you posted here and post result as soon as I finish them.
Actually, I'm doing some experiments with Keycodes and see if they'll work though I'm sure for 80% they won't. If it doesn't work, I'll think about improving it to get more chances for a good log.

I tested with Maciej. I didn't use fr kc or AHK, the anticheat didn't report anything for me.
For Maciej it worked, 90% of the report was true. Other ones were with a really fast KC tapping.

@DarkZ : I said 1000 times it's easy to do difference between a log of cheater and a log of FR user.

[Zed]

I made a Project X script

We've made.
Just correcting

[darKz]

@DarkZ : I said 1000 times it's easy to do difference between a log of cheater and a log of FR user.

You guys go on your witch hunt without me.

I'd also like it if you checked a replay of Mablak, just for the sake of it.

[Immortal]

I made a Project X script

We've made.
Just correcting

Edit : forgot to say thanks to zed for his help on testing, and scriptin' too, sorry zed  )

[Peja]

sry but wtf is going here. some of you keep saying its useful to caught someone. all we know is that we got false alarm, 10 % is a very high number.  imo it just changes nothing, its like before.
your programm only counts the taps someone is making (rene told me that, correct me if its wrong) we all know its possible to tap f@#!in fast. anyway i think this programm will create alot of porblems and false alarms.

[Aerox]

sry but wtf is going here. some of you keep saying its useful to caught someone. all we know is that we got false alarm, 10 % is a very high number.  imo it just changes nothing, its like before.
your programm only counts the taps someone is making (rene told me that, correct me if its wrong) we all know its possible to tap f@#!in fast. anyway i think this programm will create alot of porblems and false alarms.

10% is nothing considering the amount of replays we have for each player

[Immortal]

your programm only counts the taps someone is making (rene told me that, correct me if its wrong)

It checks speed of taps.

[chakkman]

It checks speed of taps.

I think you mean something else. Something like "it checks the time space needs to be released before it can be activated again". Because checking the speed wouldn't make any sense at all.

[Twyrfher]

I just want to add a tip for the logic:

(If the player cheats => the PX script will detect him)

!=

(If the PX detects some cheating => The player is cheating)

I'm not saying how the Immortal's script works, just I'm adding something for to be considered.

[Immortal]

It checks speed of taps.

I think you mean something else. Something like "it checks the time space needs to be released before it can be activated again". Because checking the speed wouldn't make any sense at all.

Well, the maximum taps speed is 2 spaces pressed in 2 frames. This happens very rarely on FR but it ALWAYS happens on the famous AHK script. This anticheats writes on a .txt when this happens with the exact frame where it happened.
Just check the script if you're a C++ coder.

I just want to add a tip for the logic:

(If the player cheats => the PX script will detect him)

!=

(If the PX detects some cheating => The player is cheating)

I'm not saying how the Immortal's script works, just I'm adding something for to be considered.

<3

[chakkman]

It checks speed of taps.

I think you mean something else. Something like "it checks the time space needs to be released before it can be activated again". Because checking the speed wouldn't make any sense at all.

Well, the maximum taps speed is 2 spaces pressed in 2 frames. This happens very rarely on FR but it ALWAYS happens on the famous AHK script. This anticheats writes on a .txt when this happens with the exact frame where it happened.

I see, sounds reasonable to me.

[Abnaxus]

If it really works, then you have done a great job.

[Dub-c]

What about people who are not using ahk to tap super fast and only to rope normally? Will it catch that?