Started by Dub-c, June 11, 2012, 06:17 PM
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote[15:52:06] [avirex`mm] worms is not my life, u f@#!ing loser
Quote from: DarkOne on June 15, 2012, 06:24 PMI suppose the killing-Chelsea-with-a-bat thing gave him that idea, fr4nk.The big question is here is how far you want to make this avoiding rule go. Thing is - if they want to win a season, they're gonna have to play against the good clans anyway or they're out.
Quote from: DENnis on June 16, 2012, 08:13 PMQuote from: DarkOne on June 15, 2012, 06:24 PMI suppose the killing-Chelsea-with-a-bat thing gave him that idea, fr4nk.The big question is here is how far you want to make this avoiding rule go. Thing is - if they want to win a season, they're gonna have to play against the good clans anyway or they're out.But without all that noobbashing and avoiding there would be only/more fair people in the Play Offs.It would work if TUS program it like u have to play minimal 1 out of 7 games vs a simular ranked guy (maximal vs. some1 where the noobbasher would only get -45 points, that would mean he has to play vs. some1 who is on a simular skilllevel)Like that or even a bit harder would mean u cant do 20 games in a row vs an absolut beginner if u r like "highly competent".Just a little filter so that no more 15-0 noobbashing in a row is possible.
Quote from: Wolfgang on June 16, 2012, 08:37 PMI see some guys u ask clanner and they asking u ''what u pick'' if u say rrtt roper or something they say u no, dunno why they want only 1 pick and no ur pick lol
Quote from: avirex on June 18, 2012, 08:19 AMLike komo said, its the ones who flat out avoid completely that are annoying
Quote from: easy on June 21, 2012, 07:07 PMbah the worst is u are our 2 leaders dont undestand we must not play against psgg PO
Quote from: TheWalrus on June 21, 2012, 07:25 PMQuote from: avirex on June 18, 2012, 08:19 AMLike komo said, its the ones who flat out avoid completely that are annoyingI find it absurd how blatant eS is about avoiding, i mean easy straight out says it here:Quote from: easy on June 21, 2012, 07:07 PMbah the worst is u are our 2 leaders dont undestand we must not play against psgg POI mean, come on.From this thread:https://www.tus-wa.com/forums/games-comments/game-114938-reported-by-dulek/?action=post;quote=127251;num_replies=1;sesc=0804938da78262a53766607fab00957f
Quote from: Statik on June 22, 2012, 12:04 PMI think this issue can be solved only by searching TUS games via the TUS site (pretty logical, huh?).Player/Clan A presses "Find a TUS game" button and waits for the random opponent. Then Player/Clan B presses his button and both get the message "Game found!" or smth... If one of them denies to play, then he loses points. It would be also nice to select preferable schemes by both sides, so they will play only one of those schemes and there won't be "my pick - your pick" rule.One more benefit: don't need to spam AG with "TUS NE1 TUS NE1 TUS NE1".But I guess it's not that easy to code. Just an idea