The Ultimate Site of Worms Armageddon

All About TUS => TUS Discussion => Topic started by: avirex on April 04, 2012, 01:14 AM

Title: roper rules check...
Post by: avirex on April 04, 2012, 01:14 AM
i think i have opened a thread about this more then once... i dont remember the outcome, and im too lazy to check the roper rules......

so can somone please answer this for me..

in a roper game, and the game turns to sudden death... rules are you have to go w2w b4 attack....

i believe you should go w2w no matter what... does not matter if u fall and have to use para on a swing to the top... does not matter if u get stuck in a pixel.... does not matter if u have to walk over the top of a worm, b4 u start to rope..... you have to go w2w..... its just like getting a crate...i have never in my long, long, long worms career seen someone say..... ehhh, i wasted some time, made a mistake... im not going for cr8......

either with their turn they get cr8, or with their retreat they get cr8... or atlesat try....

the same should go for the w2w rule... when sudden death comes w2w should be mandatory no matter what the situation....    maybe it all ready is, im not sure.... but this thread is basically to find out, and if its not... open the discussion (again) to make it a mandatory thing....


ty :p
Title: Re: roper rules check...
Post by: Dub-c on April 04, 2012, 01:16 AM
I have the solution. No sudden death, no w2w.
Title: Re: roper rules check...
Post by: nino on April 04, 2012, 01:20 AM
ok avi, from now on w2w SD will be w2w.

MI add this rule on site and close this thread.

thanks.
Title: Re: roper rules check...
Post by: Statik on April 04, 2012, 05:30 AM
hm, but what if some1 will brake this rule? skip next turn? it's kinda senseless, cuz a coward can hide well and skip all turns, oh well, you can get the top hide and kill him on the next turn, but wtf xD
Title: Re: roper rules check...
Post by: Dub-c on April 04, 2012, 05:51 AM
The rule has absolutely nothing to do with roper in the first place. Just get rid of this asinine rule and there is nothing to even worry/whine/complain/ bitch about whether someone does w2w or not. Its a f@#!ing roper, not w2w.
Title: Re: roper rules check...
Post by: Hussar on April 04, 2012, 08:02 AM
Quote from: Dub-c on April 04, 2012, 05:51 AM
The rule has absolutely nothing to do with roper in the first place. Just get rid of this asinine rule and there is nothing to even worry/whine/complain/ bitch about whether someone does w2w or not. Its a f@#!ing roper, not w2w.

just tell me honestly Dub, did u ever try roper with w2w rule??

and we talking about changing roper to "w2w rule only" or just about adding this rule ?
Title: Re: roper rules check...
Post by: Husk on April 04, 2012, 09:59 AM
Quote from: Berria on April 04, 2012, 08:02 AM
Quote from: Dub-c on April 04, 2012, 05:51 AM
The rule has absolutely nothing to do with roper in the first place. Just get rid of this asinine rule and there is nothing to even worry/whine/complain/ bitch about whether someone does w2w or not. Its a f@#!ing roper, not w2w.

just tell me honestly Dub, did u ever try roper with w2w rule??

and we talking about changing roper to "w2w rule only" or just about adding this rule ?

I believe this topic is about the sd in roper

and yea, even if u have a bad start of a turn, u should still try w2w. I hope there would be a rule for it, if there isn't alrdy.
Title: Re: roper rules check...
Post by: Peja on April 04, 2012, 10:22 AM
Quote from: Husk on April 04, 2012, 09:59 AM
Quote from: Berria on April 04, 2012, 08:02 AM
Quote from: Dub-c on April 04, 2012, 05:51 AM
The rule has absolutely nothing to do with roper in the first place. Just get rid of this asinine rule and there is nothing to even worry/whine/complain/ bitch about whether someone does w2w or not. Its a f@#!ing roper, not w2w.

just tell me honestly Dub, did u ever try roper with w2w rule??

and we talking about changing roper to "w2w rule only" or just about adding this rule ?

I believe this topic is about the sd in roper

and yea, even if u have a bad start of a turn, u should still try w2w. I hope there would be a rule for it, if there isn't alrdy.

why you want people to f@#! up something if they cant attack anyway? and if they could and are 2 scared its only good for the opponent, cant see any sense of such a rule.
Title: Re: roper rules check...
Post by: Abnaxus on April 04, 2012, 12:13 PM
Someone attacking on sd > someone staying hiden until you fall.

It's lame, but if you train well, you will beat him easly.

Anyway, I agree with this rules. Cause it's pretty hard on many maps.
Title: Re: roper rules check...
Post by: NinjaCamel on April 04, 2012, 01:22 PM
This rule would be nice. Husky da rescue dogg always forces me to touch walls ;D
Title: Re: roper rules check...
Post by: Dub-c on April 04, 2012, 02:00 PM
No need for more rules! Just get rid of sudden death. Its not needed. What is wrong with you people!
Title: Re: roper rules check...
Post by: Camper on April 04, 2012, 02:12 PM
Wanna w2w ?    Pick wxw.


Roper with no SD ftw.
Title: Re: roper rules check...
Post by: Maciej on April 04, 2012, 02:27 PM
ye, you have opened this theard too many times, and nothing changes, because everything's good, bye

btw, for me any sensible idea for roper is add the rule, that you can't attack while SD if you haven't touched 2 walls turn before
Title: Re: roper rules check...
Post by: Kaleu on April 04, 2012, 03:09 PM
Quote from: Camper on April 04, 2012, 02:12 PM
Wanna w2w ?    Pick wxw.


Roper with no SD ftw.

Ftw;
Title: Re: roper rules check...
Post by: Masta on April 04, 2012, 03:15 PM
(https://i.imgur.com/qDQeQMf.png)
Title: Re: roper rules check...
Post by: Nullum on April 04, 2012, 04:53 PM
 :-\ Don't f.. try to change anything in oldschool schemes and rules :-\
Title: Re: roper rules check...
Post by: darKz on April 04, 2012, 05:42 PM
Quote from: Nullum on April 04, 2012, 04:53 PM
:-\ Don't f.. try to change anything in oldschool schemes and rules :-\

Cracked me up.
Title: Re: roper rules check...
Post by: franz on April 04, 2012, 11:04 PM
I'd say you could remove sd, or make it longer like 20/30/50 min, or force wxw like you say, or keep it the way it is. it's probably not a huge deal either way out of any of those, but yeah, a consensus would likely help.
Title: Re: roper rules check...
Post by: Wolfgang on April 04, 2012, 11:08 PM
Quote from: Nullum on April 04, 2012, 04:53 PM
:-\ Don't f.. try to change anything in oldschool schemes and rules :-\

Agree ;p
Title: Re: roper rules check...
Post by: avirex on April 04, 2012, 11:47 PM
ok, this was a waste of time... lol



and maciej, you are the last one who should ever talk about posting something too many times... think b4 u finger roll your posts
Title: Re: roper rules check...
Post by: nino on April 05, 2012, 12:11 AM
Quote from: avirex on April 04, 2012, 11:47 PM
and maciej, you are the last one who should ever talk about posting something too many times... think b4 u finger roll your posts

Cracked me up