Forums
March 28, 2024, 02:04 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Lex

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 9
31
Announcements / Re: W:A v3.7.2 Released
« on: June 10, 2016, 10:30 AM »
The update download link has been improved on the main WA page on the wiki: https://worms2d.info/Worms_Armageddon

I only noticed that T17's website was broken on June 1st, which is when I changed the link there.

32
TUS Discussion / Re: Please explain this to me
« on: June 09, 2016, 08:47 AM »
LMAO ropa.  Good catch.  That's pretty funny.

33
Challenges Comments / Challenge #639, TTRR Challenge Week 228
« on: June 09, 2016, 03:08 AM »
Wow, Nonentity, nice new record, beating dibz by >6%.  :O

Barman's, lalo's, and dibz' records are all amazing already!

34
TUS Discussion / Re: Please explain this to me
« on: June 09, 2016, 02:55 AM »
It's not to force them to be unhappy.  They can be happy playing in more focused leagues or outside any league.  If they play in a league with 8 schemes with opponent picks, they are expected to play the picks.  It's their choice to play the league.  It's optional.  Nobody is being forced.

35
Challenges Comments / Re: Challenge #638, TT Big RR #11
« on: June 09, 2016, 02:16 AM »
It was super fun!  It proved to me that I'm not as good as I used to be in 2004 and that getting old is rough.  Somehow barman plays pretty much exactly like I used to, with the quick taps.  I can't do those for long any more or my pinky area starts aching like hell.

36
TUS Discussion / Re: Please explain this to me
« on: June 08, 2016, 10:38 PM »
It's not ridiculous at all.  It's for competition.  For those who enjoy fair competition, enabling the banning of a scheme may be a better idea than the current alternative, which is being forced to either play a seemingly unwinnable pick or not participate at all.

37
TUS Discussion / Re: Please explain this to me
« on: June 08, 2016, 07:18 AM »
Wouldn't that just be because cFc calls upon him for rope schemes?  I'm sure other cFc members have opposite proportions.

38
TUS Discussion / Re: Please explain this to me
« on: June 08, 2016, 05:02 AM »
Remember that it's a league and a league must maintain a set of rules to remain relevant.  If a competitor is not interested in a league's rules, that competitor should be playing in a different league.

39
TUS Discussion / Re: Please explain this to me
« on: June 07, 2016, 07:01 PM »
If TdC won't play a particular scheme that's in a league, TdC should not participate in said league.

40
TUS Discussion / Re: Please explain this to me
« on: June 07, 2016, 06:41 PM »
They should only agree to a clan match when they have the people they want available.  This can be organized in many ways: IRC, Skype, Discord, Mumble, TeamSpeak, etc.  SfX has always organized clan matches at least partially from outside WA, in my experience.

41
TUS Discussion / Re: Please explain this to me
« on: June 07, 2016, 06:32 PM »
A good clan has people of all types to call upon.  That's the point of a clan.  If the clan agrees to a clan match, they can use whichever members they wish for the type of game being played.  This is how the best clans historically excelled; by having experts in each scheme available.

42
Challenges Comments / Re: Challenge #638, TT Big RR #11
« on: June 07, 2016, 07:05 AM »
Yay!  I made a 98.36s replay with the beta, so that alpha one really doesn't matter!  :)

43
Challenges Comments / Re: Challenge #638, TT Big RR #11
« on: June 06, 2016, 02:13 PM »
Okay, I made one in the latest beta, 3.7.2.1, with 100.62s.  I used the right scheme and had rubberworm enabled and downloaded the right scheme, but for some reason, ldet wasn't working.  I don't think that matters in this one since I hit the finish directly.

Sorry for all the trouble with the weird replays made using the alpha.  This last one, at 100.62s, should be fine.  I'm satisfied with it for now.

44
Challenges Comments / Re: Challenge #638, TT Big RR #11
« on: June 06, 2016, 12:29 PM »
Hmm...  My 99.26s replay doesn't seem to work in WA 3.7.2.1.  I was messing around in the alpha and decided to try the challenge map again and got a good time, then I edited the version byte again when I got a time I liked, but there must be something different with the physics in the alpha.  :/  Disapprove it.  Sorry.

45
Other worms games / Re: Team17 has announced Worms WMD
« on: June 06, 2016, 11:22 AM »
If there is another weapon that can achieve this, anything you can toss from a rope that will stick to wherever it touches in a similar way, let me know?

WWP's sticky mode (ultra-high friction available through wormpot) would work.  It could just be a scheme option.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 9