Since you can't avoid this behaviour completely, why not regulate it.

Any opinions?

A free win gives a message like "don't pick this scheme again". You don't want to report a free win more than once and it makes u pick something else. No good. I admit that VoK and I have just clowned around in RR in some occasions, which is like giving a free win. You should play the pick and try your best even if u hate the scheme. You can always do the same to your opponent and pick the scheme that he hates the most. It's up to players whether they want 2 games where either player has no fun or 2 games where both players have fun.

I don't understand picking the opponent's weakest scheme when that means hardly any points and an unbalanced game, though (when u don't need to improve your winning ratio). People just want a worthless win on their record or what? Now Komo says that he enjoys BnG even if his opponent sucks but at least for me there's no fun if there's no real opponent. I don't usually pick my opponent's weakest scheme but a scheme where I'm a slight favorite. I get an exciting game and good points.

wise words #2

Get some balls, loose some matches and get better. Even after 8 years of sucking.

And trust me, when a clan feels its loosing because some schemes are hard, they will try to get new players or force some inactive friends to come back. We did it, why can't you? (and we even use whatsapp)

In name of DT i say sorry 

hauhauhauha BL ae xD

uhauhaha nino <3

suggest changes?

Easy change:

Asking for clanners should be made only this way: you ask for clanner or you don't ask for clanner.
Accepting a clanner should be made only this way: either you agree on playing it or you don't.

No conditions for the clanner should be made whatsoever. Every clan that tries to put conditions should be reported and get a penalty.

Hi people.

I recently came back to WA and was about to play a clanner with sbaffo.
DT agreed to play a clanner vs us then when games were about to start they said "we will play clanner only if you don't pick ropes"

The purpose of the "picks" system is exactly to avoid this, because obviously every clan has their strong schemes and their bad ones. So it seems pretty fair to me for every clan to be able to pick whatever scheme they want, since we are playing TUS CLASSIC, that is made for all-round wormers.

So my point is: if you are not an all-rounder why should you be allowed to play tus classic? From my point of view it should be forbidden to force in any way the opponent to pick a scheme or to exclude another. Since a clan agrees for a clanner that's it. Games should be starting with no "but" or "if".

Please share your opinion with me guys, because this really seems bullshit to me.

i will spank walrus ass