I played with franz a while back ago. He's such a nice guy, it was awesome warming on his map alongside him

Quote from: Korydex on July 20, 2017, 03:48 PM
why is this in programs section?

It is fixed.

Hey I want the exe file that says ''not suspicious at all''. Thank you.

I'd like to recommend the ''Logitech G810 Spectrum''.

It's compact, sturdy, bit heavy and it feels premium.

The G810 has no wrist rest, so if typing a lot is your thing, you could look elsewhere, or invest in your own wrist rest.
So if you intend to game and rope more than to type novels and such, I'd highly suggest investing in the 810.

Review:
http://uk.pcmag.com/logitech-g810-orion-spectrum/82805/review/logitech-g810-orion-spectrum

I have a G810 myself, and I have no regrets. It's beautiful and the backlight is smooth. The media controls are also very convenient placed, the volume wheel is easy to adjust volume, feels good to tune.

Quote from: avirex on February 13, 2017, 10:57 PM
Lol if someone did that in AG it's because they seen you in AG, and know how serious your taking all this, and wanted to poke a little fun... my point being, it's not so much that they want to "follow" me, as they want to irritate you.

I'm going to end this now, and just say I'm glad I could help inspire you kradie, zar is a nice scheme, have fun with it.

You flatter yourself too much mate but yet you are in error. You're just as same as me when it comes to building that scheme of yours.
I wasn't irritated, you claimed I was making things up, so I provided you with some information. Now you use it against me? You can do better man.

When I saw that person in AG, I was surprised over how a person could stoup so low, and now here you are at that level. Pathetic.

Quote from: avirex on February 13, 2017, 08:49 PM
Kradie, multiple people here have made comments suggesting they agree with me, and think you're a bit delusional, and according to you people even make comments to you about this outside of these forums, but instead of you seeing the truth for what it is, you wouldd rather chalk things up to everyone just being "avirex followers"

But the one thing we can agree one, it's all opinion, no matter which opinion has more facts to back up the opinion is not important, they are opinions none the less... so let's just agree to disagree.

I'm not delusional but I could have missed some crucial points to your claims? Maybe you could show me where these comments occurred? All I see at the moment is that there are some incoherent posts from a few users who haven't engaged in this topic properly. It just seems like you and I are having this discussion Avirex, and I would not like to include third parties entities into the mix unless necessary e.g ''Avirex's Followers''. In fact I saw one of these individual was on WormNET with the name ''Kradie'isa'THIEF'' and had hosted a game with the name ''zar roper = w2 original roper'', this host room was open for several 10 minutes.
Don't worry, I am sure he acted on self interest but I'm not sure how you feel about it.- For all you care it can be fabricated.

But I shall repeat myself again... I did not rob off your scheme. Your scheme is an inspiration, an alternate take on roper, as well is ZaR. We should keep it as that. But I cannot force you.

Quote from: avirex on February 13, 2017, 06:47 PM
Kradie, I'm tired of responding with you on this... so I'm not going to entertain you much more, but I will say the majority of your "changes" are more or less rule changes.

Just about everyone here is telling you the same thing, but you still want to argue your point.. it basically comes down to opinion.

Your opinion is that a new scheme was invented. That's cool, we all hope you enjoy it.

Sadly, you are reluctant to see beyond the stubbornness of your stagnant view of things.

I don't know who these ''Everyone'' are. But I am certain that you are not the voice of all ropers alike. You do not represent the majority. At this point, you only represent what you think and feel what the community represent.

Everything is opinion, this thread is about giving opinions on the varieties of the roper schemes. We have done this, we have discussed the pros and cons of each schemes. Unfortunately, your deluded superiority complex suggest hostility.

My opinion is that ZaR deserves its own name and place. I think ZaR is more competitive than Roper and Worms 2 Roper in general.
These points have been made throughout this thread.

Who cares who started/invented roping? I think it would had been inevitable at some point in time.

Quote from: Sensei on February 12, 2017, 04:25 PM
Only cool and really original scheme you made was wall2break (is that how it's called?).
But you didn't wanna listen to any suggestions of making it better and more appealing to wormers, so it got forgotten in no time.

Jetter was cool scheme, until ppl realised it was made by sbs (?) 6-7 years before you claimed it as your own. Probably just added bunch of instant mines and putted ZAR in front of it.

We all admire your desire, but let's be honest, plenty of those schemes are just plain bad. TTRR ZAR?? 200+ 0sec mines on ttrr map? Sometimes I think you're just a troller in disguise

My motivation was to contribute with unique schemes to the community. While ZaR was not not special it took off, Wall 2 Break (w2b) was not successful but still different version of WxW. I acted on the criticism I received and implemented parachute, mines, etc to the scheme to make it more friendlier to newcomers in general.
The scheme is not dead, it just lays dormant until resurrection.

You think I was serious about ZAR RR? It's only for the ''lolz'' aka entertainment. It is not to be taken lightly

Quote from: TheKomodo on February 12, 2017, 03:29 PM
Does this mean I created Darts cuz I changed the scheme? 

Everything is an evolution. We know SiD created darts, or am I wrong? 
You simply perfected it, and kept the name.

ZaR didn't keep the name because it was significant different.
Only Bazooka & Rope is available in ZaR. Therefore the name.
Start health is 180hp.
Health crate is 15hp.
5 instant mines (1 is dud).
Firebomb (Crate bomb) is allowed.
Normal Fall Damage
Normal Zook Damage.
Water level 2px.
No block (Semi is ok).

Rules are different in ZaR. You can knock a mine with bazooka onto a player before getting health crate.
Wall to wall replaces CBA when SD begins.

It's quite alright to be upset and hold grudges, I respect that. ZaR became more than we imagined.

I just hope we're still cool

Quote from: KinslayeR on February 12, 2017, 02:39 PM
this is not about avirex. I told u already 100 times Kradie, are u blind?

Only coz u changed time from 15 to 12 and added instant mine to scheme doesnt make u creator.
Hey, I have super idea, I will change from 45 to 40 seconds in t17 ,  and lets play zar t17??  Can it be offically new tus scheme? I will be very proud of myself

My sweet little Kin, I never proclaimed sole creator of ZaR.
The juxtaposition of these three schemes Worms 2 roper (Not to be confused with Avirex's version) and Roper and ZAR), are significant enough to be labeled in its own category. 

Your argument is unjustified and incoherent. Originally the Worms 2 roper had 12 seconds, which ZaR has. I stated that of what Avirex originally said ''Less time = more skill), in which ZaR focus on.
Again, nothing is stolen, only that are different versions.

How old are you mentally Avirex? This is just disappointing now.

Quote from: avirex on February 12, 2017, 07:37 AM
With less turn time, there is more hard crates, meaning more odds to even the impossible crates out... not to mention there is more strategy, and skill too.. just because you can't get a crate in 13 second and attack, or don't want to take the risk... does not mean I can't...also, one of my favorite strategies is to hide somewhere at the top, to tempt my opponent to either go for crate before attack, and hopefully miss... or go for crate after attack, and hopefully miss crate.. but then he leads me to crate, and gives me easy attack (and more then likely gave himself fd)

Kradie, cool story bro.

It's a good thing ZaR has 12 seconds turn time, that makes it more skill based. Don't you think so, bro?

It's OK Avirex.

Quote from: Sensei on February 12, 2017, 07:48 AM
Kradie, zar is scheme with 0 sec mines. Everyone lost you there.

I have to admit, YOU lost me there.

In ZaR crate values are 15hp each because bazooka does 46 in dmg. To deliver a precise 46 damage is not always that easy due to time limit and skill. So normally the average damage hit is 30-44.

You must be thinking well Kradie with that low amount of health per crate, the game must end pretty quickly. I d argue that it depends on player's dexterity and strategic approach. Often when two skilled players face each other in ZaR can end up to SD and beyond.

Increasing bazooka damage, add more health, seems a bit silly to me.

The no CBA rule and only AFR is a little noob friendly imo.

Quote from: avirex on February 10, 2017, 09:40 PM
Kradie, can I suggest making a paragraph about zar, and all its unique game play features, and just make that your forum signature?

I don't need to do that, you kind of already did it with your w2roper scheme unknowingly.

All my posts about ZaR are no difference from your posts about w2roper.
ZaR is different enough from your scheme to claim its own name.

That's pretty much it.

This is totally fine to discuss about in this topic, because the discussion is about the difference.

Quote from: TheWalrus on February 10, 2017, 04:45 PM
zar wasnt invented, nor was it a novel idea, avi is right

but jeff still didnt invent w2 roper so i dont understand why this is a thing right now

non-inventor arguing with non-inventor

however i invented zarpumpsketball, i can tell you all about that

If you put it like that, then no one really invented anything on Worms or in life in general.

Everything is built up from adaptation, and inspiration.