You can edit your scheme and set the example replay.

It's fixed.

Thanks for the review Komo

Keep the conversation clean please. *removed messages*

Tournaments can get started without enough players. So you can start this tournament with 11 players anyway.

Thanks Jago. That was helpful

It's updated.

Also the biggest TUS map ever (30mb)

Do you have Husk's mappack? If so, can you attach it here? (there are some maps missing/broken on TUS I'm trying to fix)

System picks the first player selected and in this case, Zalo first selected you then himself.

Hello Aragworm, welcome!

We're all PC players and W:A on PC has evolved from the original game by inventing lots of schemes. I don't know the answer to your question, hopefully some of the members do. If you like W:A, it definitely worth a shot to try it on PC. You won't regret it.

Quote from: MarCello on August 12, 2023, 07:00 PM
I've played with Natalia before, but she never cheated.

The cheats we talked about are about records for challenges. Not league games.

Dilbert long time! Nice to see you around

@Lupastic,

You have a tendency to jump into conclusions without solid proof. Well you don't jump though, you see the tiniest "hint" then you buy a plane ticket and fly to a conclusion in another continent.

You saw one replay of dibz which he roped different than his usual, then you decided that he is a cheater. In your head that is enough proof. Again as I have said before, you can provide your case to Deadcode/CyberShadow and let them analyze. EXACTLY how I did with Runaway and NATALIA. Both confirmed with the game maintainers. That's your solid proof. In fact I still have NATALIA's attempts. You can contact Deadcode/CyberShadow and ask them to contact me to have another go on NATALIA's case.

You have divided people into 2 groups of enemies and friends. You go to war with the tiniest excuse with your enemies and you cut your friends a huge slack.

Enemy: dibz => one unusual replay and he is a horrible cheater than should be banned for life.
Friend: NATALIA => Completely confirmed cheating case: you are sure she is innocent. Why? because your friend says so?

Runaway case is from 2016 and NATALIA's is from 2018. Both Runaway and NATALIA got banned and have done their time on TUS and they are both unbanned now. Yes I give people second chances. They are still wormers and part of this community. They are not used tissues to be thrown away. Many of them still contribute. Isn't it better to work with the community rather than mutilate it for one mistake?

I will add the author field to TUS schemes but I'd like to point out that the term we use is "submitted by" and it doesn't imply that the submitter is the author of the scheme as well.