I talked with all the participants in the disputable situation in group 4 and everyone came to an agreement. StepS and Godmax enter the knockout stage.

Quote from: Godmax on October 09, 2021, 12:28 PM
Ok so Jimmy is out and Steps, Gabriel and I have to redo the matches I presume. Only me vs. Steps and Gabriel left.
No wait wait wait. We all won against Jimmy BUT 3:0, 3:1 and 3:2. So Gabriel, who only won 3:2 against Jimmy should be out or not?

You three had the same number of wins and losses. If such a situation arises, the players can simply agree, but if discrepancies arise, then replaying the games remains preferable. Please finish your games as soon as possible, because the time will soon run out.

33:40 | The penultimate move - I almost drowned from the rising of the water and the last move - I almost drowned from the explosion of the grave and there would have been a draw, but I was lucky.

Quote from: Lupastic on October 08, 2021, 04:10 PM
You didn't want a poll vote at the Kaos tus scheme Siba, you just simply made the creator of that tus kaos scheme go there and make it clear that every match should be bo5 (cuz that's what you prefer) why are you making seem like a poll would be necessary here this time This is how the system has always been like.

Kaos originally and always was bo5 and I did not force anyone, I just asked the creator of the scheme to express my opinion and it confirmed my words, like most other people who can read and watch the scheme settings before playing.

Yes, create a poll in the League General section, I think there are already many options for discussion.

I think that the idea of erasing schemes in turn is not ideal, because the players analyze each other before the game and, first of all, the players will exclude schemes in which their opponent is clearly strong, so some mediocre nonsense will remain in the list, and not something that pleases both players.
I propose to modernize this idea: Before starting to erase schemes one by one - the players choose one scheme that cannot be deleted, and then erase the unwanted schemes. This will keep both players interested in the upcoming games.

But still it is not correct to deprive players of the game in the schemes they want, so I also adhere to the idea of simply increasing the number of games, for example, BO9 will be optimal if we take into account the number of schemes in TFL.

Quote from: Dream Trance on October 05, 2021, 12:13 AM
I was asked to comment on this from the scheme-owner perspective.

So this is my statement on this issue:

I didn't specify it in the description simply because I felt that it's obvious to play it at 3 victories as there was a built-in setting once scheme was loaded. Any change of settings is considered as intervention to the official settings and should only be done if both players agree on that I guess.

Official competitive kaos scheme was meant to be played until one player won at least 3 rounds.

Thank you.

Thanks! We really appreciate your contribution to the creation and development of the scheme and I apologize for having to distract you on such a trifle.

I hope now no one will have any questions.

Quote from: Description of the scheme2021 EDIT: yes, the scheme is strongly recommended to be played bo5 - 3 victories required (as the built-in setting shows).

Please write "Bo5" in bold in the scheme description specifically for Lupastiс and let him stop talking nonsense.

Clarification is required in the description of the circuit. bo3 or bo5?

1. In the description of the scheme, where the sequence of maps from only 4 rounds is indicated, there is a postscript "if still no winner", so this is definitely not Bo3.

2. In the "Scheme game options" the number of victories is set to 3.

I ask this because lately there have been a lot of controversies before the game. I don't mind, let the lovers of kaos bo3 play this if both players agree with it, but personally I think kaos bo5 is more correct.

In the Allround League, 5 out of 11 schemes are played and 6 schemes remain unplayed. Then 9 games out of 19 should be played in TFL and 10 unplayed schemes remain.

In short, I'm for bo9 for the TFL playoffs.  It may seem like a long time, but it is fair.

Sometimes I like to create maps in my spare time, but at the same time it will be cool if I become useful to someone.

In this thread, you can write your desires on which scheme to make a map? I, or another creative person who sees your request, will probably create such a map.

I made a map for this scheme:
https://www.tus-wa.com/maps/map-18909/
4 check points between starts and finish

Before you reach the finish line, you need to touch 4 checkpoints in turn. This will set a specific trajectory so that the player cannot just fly over the top to the finish line.

Looks funny, I like it

I became his first, after 6 years

Quote from: Danger135 on September 30, 2021, 02:35 PM
I have few questions:

1.) How I know if opponent's names are same in game, or they use different one? Some names I see here first time and I play WA few years yet.
2.) [actually I forgot what I wanted ask]
3.) Why is monkey red? 

1. You can write to your opponent in the PM and ask about it.
3. Because it's TUS Founder