Schemes > Schemes

Scheme #4732, Abnormal Shopper submitted by Lupastic

(1/1)

Lupastic:
https://worms2d.info/Shopper
Here this scheme is called "Loser Shopper" I like to name it "Abnormal Shopper" since it obviously derives from the reversed Intermediate scheme - Abnormal.

TheKomodo:
Why AFR? Shopper is more diverse where you have the option of attacking off or on rope.

The current League scheme also allows players to attack off the rope.

Lupastic:

--- Quote from: TheKomodo on October 14, 2022, 10:15 PM ---Why AFR? Shopper is more diverse where you have the option of attacking off or on rope.

The current League scheme also allows players to attack off the rope.

--- End quote ---

Thank you for the comment Komi, Shopper is universally played with AFR rule. The only place where you find non-AFR shopper scheme is TUS. For me it doesn't really make a difference if we play with our without it, but people on wormnet got used to the good old "cak" rules. (: I also share their AFR idea.

Oh and by the way, in this scheme 99% of the times you will want to attack from rope, cuz you have 10 sec roperetreat time, and 5 sec weaponretreat time. After an attack from the rope, you will always want to plop yourself at the end of the turn, that's the fastest way to die. Not attacking from rope you will struggle by walking and jumping your way to the plopholes :D AFR is ideal for Abnormal Shoppa

TheKomodo:
You said "universally" then instantly contradict that. :D

Anyway, yeah that kinda makes sense to me given the ground retreat time is 5 seconds. Though couldn't you make both 10 seconds and allow attacking off the rope for more variety to improve on the scheme for competitive gameplay?

Has that been attempted yet? Or you are specifically against off the rope attacks for other reasons?

There are many beneficial reasons why League schemes have usually had, what most serious competitive players seem to consider, improvements to schemes different from their casual counterparts.

Navigation

[0] Message Index