Tournaments > Tournaments

Tournament #966, $$BIGRR$$$TOURNAMENT

(1/4) > >>

KinslayeR:
to approve

Mega`Adnan:
Wtf Kinu, you said Max scheme would be next. Nonentity already would've win this Big RR shit.

Senator:
Can we test the new scheme/rules that will be released soon?
- no banana
- if you finish on the same turn, the remaining time on the clock decides

KinslayeR:

--- Quote from: Senator on August 03, 2017, 10:17 AM ---Can we test the new scheme/rules that will be released soon?
- no banana
- if you finish on the same turn, the remaining time on the clock decides

--- End quote ---

yes, sounds good

TheKomodo:

--- Quote from: Senator on August 03, 2017, 10:17 AM ---- if you finish on the same turn, the remaining time on the clock decides

--- End quote ---

I don't like this idea, we need something better, this is worse than the current scheme.

There are too many gain/lose sections in Big RR, it's entirely possible to get lucky and end your turn with a fall and shed 5+ seconds off your time, it's entirely possible to end your turn on a climb as well, and gain 5+ seconds.

If 2 guys are roping insanely good, and one just happens to get lucky position over the other, and wins because of this, it's bullsh*t, and you cannot allow it, it's the reason the tie turn was there originally.

The better idea is incase of draw, just rope 1 turn back from finish, whoever gets furthest with that 1 turn wins.

You don't want milleseconds in TTRR because you guys "likes draws" and "enjoy rematches" and it gives a sense of competition...

But you want to take away the same kinda thing in Big RR.

Why change your way of moral/logical thinking from scheme to scheme?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page