Cups and Tournaments => Cups and Tournaments Games Comments => Topic started by: Husk on January 02, 2017, 11:26 AM
Title: Game #216247, reported by Husk
Post by: Husk on January 02, 2017, 11:26 AM
13:18:58 Slayer: telecow victory 13:19:05 HuskyTdCs: who telecow? 13:19:18 Slayer: you did it 2 times 13:19:23 HuskyTdCs: nope 13:19:26 Slayer: teleporting under me 13:19:28 HuskyTdCs: yes? 13:19:32 Slayer: where I can get you 13:19:35 HuskyTdCs: u can still kill my worm without huring ur own 13:19:40 Slayer: I can't 13:19:42 HuskyTdCs: sure u can 13:19:43 HuskyTdCs: shotgun 13:20:02 Slayer: being on the roof I couldn't get your worm 13:20:10 HuskyTdCs: that's ur fault lol 13:20:16 HuskyTdCs: choose ur hide more smarter =)
Title: Re: Game #216247, reported by Husk
Post by: XanKriegor on January 02, 2017, 11:31 AM
Bad hide + cheap tele. You may agree on a rematch any time, i would advice you to make it, and to make it bo3.
Title: Re: Game #216247, reported by Husk
Post by: Husk on January 02, 2017, 11:37 AM
bad hide + cheap tele?
bad hide yes slayer
cheap tele? here u pull the cheap card, hiding on top is cheap in roper but if ur opponent bluff u call him, slayer bluffed me thinking i wud play with his strings, look at this shit he write in ag:
13:26:43 Slayer: I put my worms on the roof 13:26:48 HuskyTdCs: yeah 13:26:51 HuskyTdCs: it's a bad tactic m8 13:26:54 HuskyTdCs: someone can just tele under u 13:27:04 Slayer: you could put your worm on another roof
that looks like some dictator shit to me, why am I forced to tele on roof just because my opponent teles on roof?
i asked for rematch he said no... soooo |:
Title: Re: Game #216247, reported by Husk
Post by: Hurz on January 02, 2017, 12:22 PM
scheme sucks? :D
Title: Re: Game #216247, reported by Husk
Post by: Slayer on January 02, 2017, 12:26 PM
His teles were definitely dirty. But rules don't give us detailed description of telecow. I just explained suomi that such teles are bad manners or something unfair. No rematch of course. I am not a girl and don't show everybody private talkings.
Title: Re: Game #216247, reported by Husk
Post by: XanKriegor on January 02, 2017, 12:34 PM
We dont do such things indeed but Husk does not play GW with us, neither rules pointing out that such behavior is wrong, so we cant expect him tp play just as we do.
Title: Re: Game #216247, reported by Husk
Post by: Peja on January 02, 2017, 12:48 PM
Yay noob cups ftw
Title: Re: Game #216247, reported by Husk
Post by: xSniperx on January 02, 2017, 12:49 PM
wtf is all this moaning shit about being dirty ?
If it;s not against the rules and the best way to win why the hell would you expect him not too.
you're argument is basically " he only won because he didn't play the way i wanted him too" . haha winning would be easy all the time if this is the case.
Title: Re: Game #216247, reported by Husk
Post by: Chelsea on January 02, 2017, 01:23 PM
1. shit cup 2. shit scheme 3. Husk didn't do anything against rules 4. Husk ftw ae! :)
Title: Re: Game #216247, reported by Husk
Post by: Sensei on January 02, 2017, 01:35 PM
Slayer doesn't like losing, that's a known fact. But to call out Husk like this, it's just unnecessary.
Title: Re: Game #216247, reported by Husk
Post by: Slayer on January 02, 2017, 02:05 PM
Strange statement. Can you show me someone who like losing? May be you?)) Don't confuse your prejudice with the attempt to set people on the right path
Title: Re: Game #216247, reported by Husk
Post by: Sensei on January 02, 2017, 02:24 PM
Ofc I don't like it. But some guys just don't like it more, and you're one of them. Why not admit it and move on?
Husk is probably fairest player out there on wnet. With you, on the other hand, I've had numerous ugly situations. So, what's wrong with sharing an opinion..
Title: Re: Game #216247, reported by Husk
Post by: Slayer on January 02, 2017, 02:38 PM
I recommend you to refrain from personal assessments because if someone decides to give you an assessment, then you risk to hear the mass of unflattering words. So watch yourself and let us to solve our misunderstanding. I think Husk doesn't need any lawyer here.
Title: Re: Game #216247, reported by Husk
Post by: Sensei on January 02, 2017, 02:59 PM
Ye ye, np, you're so great :)
Btw, Xan, as a cup moderator, why you suggesting rematch if winner didn't do anything wrong? What kind of mockery is this?
Ok, moving on.
Title: Re: Game #216247, reported by Husk
Post by: Slayer on January 02, 2017, 03:13 PM
Rematch was suggesting by Husk, before Xan. As you don't play grenade wars scheme you don't know that we don't teleport our worms closely to opponent's worm in a way when we can shoot him, and opponent can't get our worm like it was in this game. But you should notice next: - I didn't start this topic - I didn't ask for rematch - I tried to explain this nuance with teleports
Title: Re: Game #216247, reported by Husk
Post by: xSniperx on January 02, 2017, 03:35 PM
The point is slayer, regardless of how you play with your pals. it's not in the scheme rules. when i play hyst funners we don't teleport onto worm advantage but would i expect to join a league game and someone not do it to me ... hell no. Conclusion: Husk did nothing wrong. only mistake here is you expecting him to play a certain way.
Title: Re: Game #216247, reported by Husk
Post by: XanKriegor on January 02, 2017, 04:34 PM
Good words, Sniper.
Sensei, i did not say You Have To Rematch, it was just an advice, coz both Slayer's hide ad Husk's teleportation. The latter does not play GW with the rest and its stupid to expect from him same behavior like from ones who play it regularly. At the end, 1 worm vs 1 worm, at same "altitude" Husk outnaded Slayer, so the game stays. Husk, as the winner, can suggest a rematch, bo3, 5 or wharever, and apparently, he did. At the end, they both will be proceeded, so...
Title: Re: Game #216247, reported by Husk
Post by: Street on January 02, 2017, 04:49 PM