[2012-11-11 18.20.27] ••• RwA`Chelsea is hosting a game on DirectIP named "RwA`Chelsea"
[2012-11-11 18.20.59] ••• Incoming connection on slot 0
[2012-11-11 18.21.00] ••• Player joined: Admin
[2012-11-11 18.21.00] ••• Validated connection: 0, 1, Admin
[2012-11-11 18.21.03] ••• Connection closed: 0, 1
[2012-11-11 18.21.03] ••• Player parted or was kicked: Admin
[2012-11-11 18.21.05] ••• Incoming connection on slot 0
[2012-11-11 18.21.05] ••• Player joined: MIGHTY`taner
[2012-11-11 18.21.05] ••• Validated connection: 0, 1, MIGHTY`taner
[2012-11-11 18.21.08] ••• Incoming connection on slot 1
[2012-11-11 18.21.09] ••• Player joined: Happy-holiday
[2012-11-11 18.21.09] ••• Validated connection: 1, 2, Happy-holiday
[2012-11-11 18.21.11] [MIGHTY`taner] t17
[2012-11-11 18.21.11] ••• Booting player: Happy-holiday
[2012-11-11 18.21.11] ••• Connection closed: 1, 2
[2012-11-11 18.21.11] ••• Player parted or was kicked: Happy-holiday
[2012-11-11 18.21.16] [RwA`Chelsea] wxw for me
[2012-11-11 18.21.17] [MIGHTY`taner] wxw?
[2012-11-11 18.21.21] [MIGHTY`taner] ok free win for you
[2012-11-11 18.21.24] [MIGHTY`taner] i cant play that
[2012-11-11 18.21.27] [RwA`Chelsea] ok....
[2012-11-11 18.21.32] [MIGHTY`taner] t17
[2012-11-11 18.21.59] • Game will take advantage of the latest 3.6.31.0 features and bug fixes
[2012-11-11 18.22.00] ••• Starting game, recorded as file "User\Games\2012-11-11 18.22.00 [Online] @RwA`Chelsea, MIGHTY`taner.WAgame"
If I understood it well, Chelsea picked wxw before they played anything. His opponent refused to play so he just set t17 and took free win. Poor attitude and even worse fighting spirit from MIGHTY (taner?). Players like him should get some kind of punishment for sport misconduct. Free wins can't be accepted just because one player is too lazy to play opponent's scheme... Play both or nothing. What do you think about this rule? (same if someone refuses to play opponent's pick after his one been played, it uses to be often situation)
Quote from: Maciej on November 11, 2012, 10:52 PM
If I understood it well, Chelsea picked wxw before they played anything. His opponent refused to play so he just set t17 and took free win. Poor attitude and even worse fighting spirit from MIGHTY (taner?). Players like him should get some kind of punishment for sport misconduct. Free wins can't be accepted just because one player is too lazy to play opponent's scheme... Play both or nothing. What do you think about this rule? (same if someone refuses to play opponent's pick after his one been played, it uses to be often situation)
agree