The Ultimate Site of Worms Armageddon
Leagues => Leagues Games Comments => Topic started by: Sbaffo on March 20, 2024, 06:32 PM
-
Nice chat
-
Lupa so bad he has to resort to calling blitz as cheater hahah
-
As far as I know, people can reject secondary schemes, such as Tower and BnA, and insist on playing the primary variants, i.e. Big RR and Mine Madness.
-
[dF-blitzed`zar] It will ruin all my big rr games which i worked hard to win
This is EXACTLY why Big RR and Tower Race should be separated, they are two different schemes!
It's insane that Lupastic is #1 for Big RR when the majority of his Big RR / Tower Race games are actually Tower Race matches.
I believe Tower Race should be in the main League because it's a very good scheme, but it's a completely different style of roping than all other rope schemes.
Not bothered if it gets moved to TFL though.
[Lupi] why is it always in this game that usually avoider people call non-avoiders as "avoider" ?:P
blitzed is the #1 ranked player overall and he plays everyone as much as he can lol.
Unlike you, when he finds top players, he will play them quite a lot, rather than just 1 or 2 games then play noobs over and over.
That's WHY he's better than you, and always will be.
As for calling blitzed a cheater, using macros and scripts, this does not make sense whatsoever because he's not even suspiciously fast at anything he does... There are dozens of players who rope faster and more suspiciously than blitzed and have proved they are legit via videos/streaming etc.
Lupastic is the literal definition of being ignorant.
-
As far as I know, people can reject secondary schemes, such as Tower and BnA, and insist on playing the primary variants, i.e. Big RR and Mine Madness.
you can reject the map, but not decide whether it is tower/big rr or not.
-
cmon now, don't be shit talking dibs, he is goated in tus.
-
[Lupi] you cant avoid any schemes
also lupa
"wanna tus? defaults only"
-
If it is an argument about the 3rd game match, the suggested scheme can be refused. If it is a new pair of league matches, you can't reject any schemes. So Lupastic is correct if the negotiation is about 2 new schemes to play.
-
If it is an argument about the 3rd game match, the suggested scheme can be refused. If it is a new pair of league matches, you can't reject any schemes. So Lupastic is correct if the negotiation is about 2 new schemes to play.
Lmao since when? I’ve had dozen of people like harpy and co agreeing for tus and then asking me to change my pick as soon as they would join my host or even running away. This is the first time i hear about this
-
Lmao since when? I’ve had dozen of people like harpy and co agreeing for tus and then asking me to change my pick as soon as they would join my host or even running away. This is the first time i hear about this
You can't reject any schemes, but you can also agree to any schemes you want:
(https://i.imgur.com/o5r1kwe.png)
-
Wtf does that even mean
-
Wtf does that even mean
Which part? I'll try and explain it for you.
-
Sbaffo, it's a trap.
-
Wtf does that even mean
You can do either your pick / my pick, or multiple mutual picks.
If you want to play only specific schemes, you must make this clear when looking for TUS. For example: "TUS BnG anyone?" or "TUS no Elite anyone?". Openly searching "TUS anyone?" but then refusing to play a specific scheme is considered avoiding. After you have found out the opponent's scheme pick, you must play the game.