Leagues > Leagues
Game #236970, reported by Lupastic
nino:
Thats why ELITE > ROPER
:D :D :D :D :D
Kradie:
Sometime when I host ZaR beginner would join, and sometime they would only hide on top. I never complained about it because they are new. If they weren't new I would probably ask about it and have a rule Implemented xD. But it is as MonkeyIsland said ''The main objective is to be your best and win the game.'' Lupastic did his best. If there was a rule preventing top hiding I am sure he and everyone else would honor it. On the other hand should we add a rule when somebody does something we don't like? Is top hiding really THAT bad?
I just wanted to add my thoughts to the conversation. Nothing personal of course.
FoxHound:
For me this is a similar case to "telecow", "rotation manipulation" in Hysteria.
TheKomodo:
I'm an oldschooler, I think hiding on top is acceptable.
It's a video game, you play by the scheme rules, everything else is acceptable.
You win by any means necessary, this is competition where men and women compete and aim to annihilate each other.
Edit - Granted, I didn't use to feel this way. I used to agree with Free.
TheKomodo:
--- Quote from: FoxHound on June 05, 2023, 02:34 PM ---For me this is a similar case to "telecow", "rotation manipulation" in Hysteria.
--- End quote ---
Why is that similar? The argument against hiding on top versus "telecow" is vastly different.
People use telecow to get back into a game that they are behind in, without the ability to pile, Hysteria is RNG based and for lesser skilled players who value balanced competition. Players hide on top in Roper when they are ahead to maintain their lead.
That's completely different.
Players are just pissed in Roper because it means they have even less chance to come back after a mistake or tough crate.
Roper is a stupid scheme anyway, it's so ridiculous luck based it feels pointless to me now.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version