We have a Tus Elite League, can we please have a Tus Roper League. I would love to be able to play another scheme as all I play is TEL right now.
Having TEL and not having TRL is racist in my opinion.
gogo TRL!!!
TUS should have 1 scheme league division for the most competitive schemes only: Elite, Rope, RR, BnG, Team17.
Quote from: mirux on December 16, 2010, 02:29 AM
TUS should have 1 scheme league division for the most competitive schemes only: Elite, Rope, RR, BnG, Team17.
Lets stay on topic and worry about those other schemes later. Lets just work on Roper and TRL for now! ;D
TBN xD
tus boom race league xD
Quote from: Chelsea on December 16, 2010, 07:11 AM
TBN xD
tus boom race league xD
Make your own thread. K
There are very fewer people who like to play a roper league and imo they are mostly ex-w2 wormers. Like you or TitiO.
And I don't think adding another league to our 3-league collection would be such a good idea, unless we change TEL to TRL (Rotated league) where we could change the scheme time to time, but I'll be assassinated by Elite-freaks as soon as I change Elite.
Anyway, that's my starter opinion. Convince me tus community :)
Quote from: MonkeyIsland on December 16, 2010, 08:22 AM
There are very fewer people who like to play a roper league and imo they are mostly ex-w2 wormers. Like you or TitiO.
And I don't think adding another league to our 3-league collection would be such a good idea, unless we change TEL to TRL (Rotated league) where we could change the scheme time to time, but I'll be assassinated by Elite-freaks as soon as I change Elite.
Anyway, that's my starter opinion. Convince me tus community :)
I find it very hard that you know that very few people like to play roper. You are already trying to bias peoples opinions. I don't want TEL changed to anything and I think that will confuse people from what I'm wanting. I want TEL to stay, I don't want a TEL vs a roper league discussion. I want TEL and ROPER. Roper is the most classic league scheme there is (bng also but there is a2b for that). People played roper way before any of those other schemes in TUS. Because of that, I believe it deserves its own league.
Maybe I'm living in the past and the community really doesn't care about roper anymore, but I hope not, hopefully people give their opinions.
Whats the activity level of the free league? 3 free league clanners so for this season WATCHOUT. About on average 10 games a day.
Tel averages over 25 games a day and 5 pages of clanners.
SO which league do you think is more important? Free league or TEL? and if one had to be changed to a roper league why would you say the TEL league would need changed?
Keep in mind I'm not asking for any league to be turned into a roper league.
I GUARANTEE, if there was a roper league right now, it would average more then 10 games a day and more then 3 clanners a season.
This is interesting, I remember XTC having a separate roper league, that turned out quite well actually. Well, some people will smack me in the face for saying that, but I never really liked the Free League... :-X I mean, it's a great thing that those schemes get a competitive platform, but the way it works now, it is the system of a classical league, both players pick a scheme, in which case, you have to be familiar with over 20 schemes to have a chance against your opponent.
Anyway, this is not a discussion about the Free League, if I was MonkeyIsland, I would change that to the Roper League and keep the Cups for such schemes. But that's no solution either. :( Adding one more league would be too much in my opinion.
If not free league not me at tus [only cups and clanners]
Free league is the best ! so much better than clasic :P
lol if do trl so maybe tus t17 league tus shoppa league....... it's so funny :D
trl - idiot idea
I'm in favour of killing the free league (maybe add a misc-stat to the classic league, allowing players to choose other schemes when both players agree to it).
Adding another roper league would be too much. In that case I'm more in favour of splitting TUS into seperate scheme-leagues, the ones Mir mentioned.. but that would totally kill Allroundness :(
I think the cups already provide enough for those who wish to play 1 scheme only. If that's not enough you can try to get the highest rating in Roper (even though nobody gives a crap about that :-[)
Quote from: HHC on December 16, 2010, 11:10 AMI'm in favour of killing the free league.
I was not brave enough to say it out loud like this, but I'm gonna join the line here: +1 for removing the Free League and either replacing it with a Rotated League or a Roper League.
I think it should stay the way it is, it's a good idea from Johnny absolutely nothing wrong with showing enthusiasm and respect for a scheme, but surely we can't have single scheme leagues popping up everywhere now can we?
Classic League - For All-Round competition with single scheme statistics/standings, the most common and most popular on Wnet, always will be in any league.
Free League - For all those less popular and uncommon yet still challenging/interesting and competitive schemes, some people take it serious, which is good, but the majority who play it, just enjoy the less popular schemes at a more relaxed yet competitive level.
Elite League - The most popular scheme on TUS, with such global interest and challenge, this scheme deserves to have it's own league.
This is all we need in my opinion, things are running smoothly and extremely active at the moment, all 3 of these leagues see constant activity, even Free league is picking up, I don't see why Roper League is relevant, sure, people will play it, but nowhere near as much as Classic/Elite Leagues, I honestly think it's time to put the foot down and say no more new leagues.
It'd be a shame for all the people who really enjoy Free League and Elite League if you were to change them/get rid of them.
I honestly don't see why we need anything else really, does anyone else?
Wow Komo, well put, really.
Well, if I was on a level with websites that I could make a league system by myself, I would maybe give it a try to create a separate league - with no intention of rivalry, really - but I'm just not on that level yet. :(
I vote a big YES for a roper league in TUS !
And if TUS doesnt want to open it, I can help to make a separate one.
+ Dub you should re-open a new thread with a more explicit title and a poll "Tus Roper League, vote"
I think it would be pretty cool if we had seperate leagues for all schemes and calculate, in some manner, the results in each of those leagues towards one global all-round stat. That would give a lot more importance to each seperate scheme-league.
I don't play much TUS at the moment, and not very seriously either. But I'd definitely play for a T17-league.
It would also get me out of RR matches I dont wanna play.
On the other hand, it would get confusing in wormnet when one player asks for an Elite TUS, the other for BnG TUS and so forth :(
The ideal league does not exist? ???
Hey HHC, does your WL script still work? :p
It's all over the net ;)
http://script.wareseeker.com/PHP/webleague-2.0.1.zip/30c2e8ab84
Quote from: HHC on December 16, 2010, 12:21 PM
It's all over the net ;)
http://script.wareseeker.com/PHP/webleague-2.0.1.zip/30c2e8ab84
Ahah yeah I know, I've looked for it many times, but first time the link is working !! Thanks
Ok ive made a poll here : https://www.tus-wa.com/forums/tus-discussion/tus-roper-league-!-vote-yes-or-no/ (https://www.tus-wa.com/forums/tus-discussion/tus-roper-league-!-vote-yes-or-no/)
Please vote
In my opinion scheme for a seperate league should be based nearly only on skill and roper definitely doesn't fit for me. The only acceptable schemes for me are elite (we have TEL arleady) and rope race (pure skill, no pain no gain here). So, TRRL any1? :)
ah! I just wanted to make similar topic, but haven't got time, and about league for ttrr. Why ttrr? Because it's quick scheme, and there were times when I played few rope races in a row with for example dibz, Flori or Daina. IMO ttrr is best scheme for separate league, but there is only one problem, if we make separate leagues for each schemes (or at least for roper, ttrr and elite) what will happen to classic league? ;S
Any ideas?
but TRRL would be really, really nice! And you don't need much time to play it, just 4 minutes and games is done!
BnG is pure skill !
I think a rope league could have roper + ttrr schemes. Maybe 1 general standing for both, and separate standings for each !
I can see dub's point tho. If elite gets its own league why can't roper? There is nothing to stop anyone creating specific scheme leagues by themselves. Thats how they came about in the first place with wel and more recently a2b.
If tus hosed it tho it will take more activity away from the classic league.
Why isnt climbing the elite rating and elite ladder of classic league enough for you? Id be more statified with that and trying to be number 1 in elite on there or number 1 on roper in classic than reaching playoffs and winning a single scheme league. Yea its fun because you know your always going to pick elite in those schemes but ive played players in tus and don't pick for point but for fun. Many elites and t17s vs uber and franz because more enjoyable instead of picking bng or whatever for more points. Although that isnt really related.
I think its a dangerous road for tus to create more single scheme leagues, but an open ball game for anyone to create them individually and see how much activity they get.
Quote from: Chicken23 on December 16, 2010, 01:28 PM
I think its a dangerous road for tus to create more single scheme leagues, but an open ball game for anyone to create them individually and see how much activity they get.
Good idea. A league that would only have single games, 1 table of standing for each scheme !
Every scheme has it's own style, every scheme needs to be played well, every scheme needs tactic (except TTRR maybe). If you are good in BnG, it doesn't mean you have won 80% of your Hysteria matches. If you are good in WxW, doesn't mean you have won 80% of your Roper matches.