How sweet. Peja had no arguements, so he calls for barmanxd That doesnt make what you postulating true however, there is no different from quitting a game, to surrender - i hope i dont have to explain its the same outcome. It simply makes a hole different tactic to play with one player less.
Quote from: barman on November 09, 2013, 07:02 PM
Quote from: HusH on November 09, 2013, 05:04 PM
Surrender = quit
Surrender is a utitility in your invertory. You may use it in order to change the order after your move. Doing so still poses a chance of being disadvantageous, since you need to use up one turn in order to raise the flag, while you normally might want to do something more useful, like simply inflicting damage to your opponent
This is not equivalent to quitting, which alters the game before you get to legally perform a move and breaks the game beyond repair.
Are you sure about this? Let me tell you, if lack of experience or lack of understanding should be a problem. In our case it sure had an effect. Since nico couldnt attack peja who had quit, he had to attack chelsea, who was just next to me. That way it was good in 2 ways for aef, pileadvance and damage from nico's attack.
Its funny to see how first peja tries to mislead the mods, now barman. I really dont care how you played the game in the past. Surrender = quit, white flag is a utitlity to make game more smooth if a restart is needed - not to make a 2vs2 clanner a 2vs1 game.
If what you saying was true, the league from now will be played a hole different way in rope schemes. Thought we had enoguh of your changning the schemes, as it happen with your notching table and bng - if not all, you are part reason why bng now has to be played with ts, thx.. Well if it was true what you said, i guess all there is left to say is, let the best man win ! Or maybe just go play some single league game.