Quote from: Guaton on August 30, 2012, 04:14 PM
Quote from: zippeurfou on August 30, 2012, 03:54 PM
To be honest I agree with you avirex
. We are not computer but I prefer the way it is in a game like wow. If someone lagg out it's automatic win for the other team (except 2vs2 where he just stand and do nothing). I remember a game against a clan, we were playing elite and winning by A LOT. Then one of them did lagg out. They did ask for a rh with handicap... but common it is non sens to rh an elite with handicap. What about the weapon delay, what about the hide and the weapon already used...
I asked for some common sens and fair play but they did stick on there side. It ended by a cancel of the clanner and me having a bad view of this clan.
If someone lagg out this should be an automatic win for the other team and it should be the other team (the non lagging one) who should be able to decide to continue or not. All this rh thing is just more drama. Hell, we are in 2012 if you can't get your internet to work properly with a 1999 game it is not the opponent who should be blamed !
With a rule like that you would have far less complain and unsporting behavior. It might sound a little harsh but it would end a lot of 2 hours clanner for one game or some people feeling cheated by mod because they don't agree with their judgement.
worms community appreciate how fair u are and ur sportmanship.
about "we are in 2012 if you can't get your internet to work properly with a 1999 game it is not the opponent who should be blamed !" is pure bs , i can do nothing if the internet goes out cos of a problem coming from the internet company , or if the light goes out , or if the router is not working well , well i can with changes , but that kind of problems are gonna keep going (less frequent maybe , who knows) doesnt matter what change i do.
im glad u have a perfect internet , enjoy it
.
you are just supporting some1 who his only purpose is annoy or make drama , the only thing , as u can check in the log , we asked was handicap for them , not even a plus for us , just 2 minus for them (1 each one), logic thing , they were even going to have double of their last hp , and its roper , they could have got the advantage easily, but no , he prefered to get advantage of the situation.
we even let avirex play instead of free in the previous rr with free's last worm ffs , cos free was having problems ... yeah i didnt want to , but just to avoid drama i did let avirex play ... (then he called me faggot and hosted the roper calling the host "faguaton" XD )
Guaton, I am not speaking about your complaint at all. To be honest I did not watch the game nor try to read both point of view. What I am saying is totally general speaking about what I think is a flow in the rules

. All I can say, is by the number of replies you give, you seem pretty involved in it

.
Watch out TaG and MM situation right now. Do you call it a fair and sportmanship way to handle things. To quote statik:
Quoteoh.. don't make me start to hate league games again were my first after a while
In this community, when you let a little door open for negotiation, it never ends..
What did happens against this clan was like this:
We were winning by A LOT. They did lagg out. They asked to rh the elite with handicap for them. I did disagree because:
1. We were going to win (i'd say 90% of chance).
2. RH in elite with handicap is just meaningless (like in most scheme imo).
3. I didn't have much time and I felt like a waste of time.
If you think, I never had problem with WA or my internet, you are deeply wrong. Just the first example i can find out: my last single tus games I played, I did warn the opponent when I knew my computer could have problem. And I did tell them that they could report it in case of bug from me. I did find it fair and I had one case with Random (because of my stupid reflex) and I really would never have asked him to rh with handicap. If you watch the game, I dare you to find any kind of handicap/worms number recombination that would be fair for both side. It is my fault (not directly but indirectly and I have to own the responsibility of it.
All I mean is: It is not my fault if my opponent internet is not working and I shouldn't suffer from it. When rh with handicap is meaningless and mostly unfair for a team (like most of the case) I don't see any other alternative.
Judging by the number of complaint or people feeling cheated by mod. Tell my how this rule could be worse than the actual rule:
"If someone lagg out or quit it is up to the opponent to decide to keep playing (for clanner), to get the win or to rh".
One easy and simple rule and you are rid of all this complaint and non-understandable rules.