You just have to change his nick and informations to a random thing MI.
So you still get his account for games etc, and Ombi wouldn't get it anymore (no nick in it, neither mail, etc..).

If we talk about teachers, then I'll add Yeppa to my list.
He once had the patience to teach me how to rope, and I really thanks him for this !

I guess people would like the old BnG more: 20sec, unanchored, nades, zooks and clusters (why not adding mortars if you wish, it's still in the context of BnG) and there was no rules except "don't be cheap".
But this rule is only about people: you don't have to, but if you don't, you'll just look like a faggot.

So maybe if we take it and add some rules of the current BnG scheme, it would be funnier.

We can also add all kind of nades (even holy) and just review the powers.
But if we do this, we would have to set clear rules which would be much more involved.

PS: Devilage's proposition sounds also cool.
Cause all real BnG players hate the way it is played in this league. So why not removing it ?
This way, BnG haters wouldn't have to play it, and BnG lovers wouldn't have to endure cheapers.
It makes less point for us, but more fun (which is the aim of Worms), so it's seriously welcome.
And as he said, we still get our a2b to play lovely BnGs.

Quote from: Leroy on December 09, 2010, 10:15 AM

Quote from: Abnaxus on December 07, 2010, 03:52 PM
Wtf ??

Leroy = Tower ??
The one who stopped once Worms for CS ?
Is that true ? *.*

I never played CS.

Hu ? Do I mistake with Future ?
Someone said he was playing CS1.6 Spain Leagues, and I was sure it was you. 

Anyway faggot ! Why did you never catch me for some Ropers ? xP

Is there any other WWP players aliasing this way ?

Quote from: HHC on December 09, 2010, 11:49 AMbut I was expecting TTRR to get votes for the same reason (I suck at it, utterly, but the principle of the game is something I can't disapprove of).

Quote from: HHC on December 09, 2010, 12:37 AMTry not to vote on schemes you suck at, but only on those you simply find boring, stupid, crap.

WxW: It's just a practice scheme, where you learn to be regular (no strategy, or less enough to look like so).
Apart from that, it's freaking boring (at least all new maps), and luck is too much involved in it (and no way to counter it).
It's between Shoppa and RR, but a damn bad balance.

Wtf ??

Leroy = Tower ??
The one who stopped once Worms for CS ?
Is that true ? *.*

D'oh !

Quote from: Dulek on December 06, 2010, 01:19 PM
Avirex has posted some time ago some pure ownage run by Anubis as well. Though utilities might have been used.

3rd turn after (around 6:10) is freakin' funny. xD

--

--

--

1) Community.
2) -
3) Seita.

About hardware:
- SAPPHIRE HD5850-1024 VaporX ( 11162-03-40R ).
- INTEL i3 560 3.33GHz DMI 4Mo cache socket 1156 Integrated Video.
- ASUS P7H55-M - Chipset Intel H55 Express.
- KINGSTON Hyper X Blu - 4Go (2x 2 Go) - PC12800 (1600 MHz) - KHX1600C9D3B1K2/4GX.

Quote from: nino on December 03, 2010, 02:57 PMdownload the tool process explorer and take a look at the I/O graphic when playing it, if possible post it here, check the use of CPU b4 play and playing it, memory isnot a problem, WA doesnot alocate much anyway.

Gne ? It's like chineese for me. xD
How to do so ?

--

Seems like it worked Chakkman, thanks very much !