Main Menu
Search
EnglishUnited Kingdom
Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - Abnaxus

#811
TUS Discussion / Re: Style BnG league
April 02, 2010, 04:48 PM
Quote from: beer on April 02, 2010, 01:24 PM
hi dave, just let u know that ur clan is still there https://www.tus-wa.com/forums/bor/
Do you know what PM is ? Your message has nothing to do there.

PS: Mods, please delete both messages when you're online.
#812
TUS Discussion / Re: Style BnG league
April 01, 2010, 10:55 AM
Quote from: komo on April 01, 2010, 09:58 AMI will be active on WA again if this league picks up
In any case you have to, godamn you ! :p
#813
TUS Discussion / Re: Style BnG league
March 31, 2010, 10:25 PM
The invit link doesn't work (error 404).

Maybe m3ntal didn't place those pages in on the new server.
#814
TUS Discussion / Re: Style BnG league
March 31, 2010, 01:12 PM
4sec full power nades aren't cheap if there are not repeat again and again. .)

They now look bad cause most of the league players were abusing of it.
But in a great BnG game, it can be very nice !

Btw, Good Job M3ntal for that quick open.
I hope I'll see some god BnG players, to remember old great time. ^^
#815
Leagues General / Re: A solution for PO
March 30, 2010, 11:20 AM
What about adding a minimum "Winning percentage" (like 60-70%) ?

Then, as SPW said, the quality would really surround quantity.
#816
TUS Discussion / Re: Style BnG league
March 30, 2010, 11:14 AM
Ho ok, wasn't thinking about this, that's a good rule then.
But anyway, you should make the first part of the 3rd rule around 15HP: because repeating a 15Hp nade damage is still too much (but if it's an invite only league, there wouldn't be such cheapers).

And I agree with Ramone about the "invite only".

PS: When does this #@!&% Komo will come back !? >.<
#817
TUS Discussion / Re: Style BnG league
March 29, 2010, 10:42 PM
Quote from: a2b1. No straight bazooka shots.
2. No sitters.
3. No repeat shots.
   * If you hit someone for 34 HP or less with a shot, you can't use that same shot again until you have hit them with a different one.
   * If you hit someone for 35 HP or more with a shot, you can't use that same shot again until either you or they have moved.
4. No 5 second grenades unless used with low gravity or max bounce
5. All shots should be aimed to explode on impact with the opponents worm.
6. Re-aim the crosshair between every turn, regardless of whether you landed a hit last turn or not.
7. Don't teleport too close to your opponent's worm (try to stay at least half the map away).
8. No notching unless you can't help it (ie, your perfect aim is 1 or 2 taps off vertical).
9. No telecides (teleporting on your opponent when you have low health in order to inflict grave damage on them).
10. No defensive girders, only use girders for bouncing nades.
11. 3 points for a win.
12. 1 point for a loss.
13. Seasons last 2 months.

The 3rd rather be "If you hit someone for 17HP (or something this way) or more with a shot, you can't use that same shot again until you have hit them with a different one.".
Because with the 35HP or more, it means the shooter has to move (using teleport) after he hit: so he loses a turn.

Except if this rule is there to oblige people training their damage skills.
But then, it would be a very pro league: and even Komodo wouldn't be good enought (Are you ? :p).
#818
Schemes Comments / Re: T17 scheme, By Ray
March 28, 2010, 12:02 PM
Quote from: Dulek on October 28, 2009, 07:51 AM
Quote from: pr on October 27, 2009, 07:21 PMSince it started to be annoying to be blocked each turn before the SD begins
It happens mostly when you have 1 worm and your oponnent has 3 or 4.
It's the only way to beat your opponent.

And most of the time, if on SD there is 1v3, it means that someone of them had very much luck (bananas, holys, etc..).
So it's normal to block him because he can still have powerfull weapons.
#819
Maps / Dragon's maps.
March 27, 2010, 12:17 PM
Just made the possibility to download all maps in a .rar

So if you'd like some new/old maps:
http://xdragonfirex.free.fr/
#820
TUS Discussion / Re: Style BnG league
March 27, 2010, 12:13 PM
Quote from: Ramone on March 26, 2010, 12:23 PMGive me few days to try and contact M3ntal and Komo, to see what they think about it and if they would have time to do it.
We sure can help them if they don't. .)
#821
TUS Discussion / Re: Style BnG league
March 25, 2010, 08:55 PM
Just let a2b comes back: would be the best.

PS: Maciej, you can't compare a cheap gameplay in BnG with one in other schemes.
BnG isn't just a scheme, it's a way of playing: if you just play to earn points, then you'd rather not play it.

PSS: Unanchored BnG & Hardcore Maps Ftw ! .)
#822
Leagues Complaints / Re: t17 21400
March 18, 2010, 11:20 PM
Quote from: DarkOne on March 18, 2010, 09:27 PM
Actually, I'd prefer the opinion of a mod that routinely plays T17, Wooka :) Since I don't play it often enough to make a good prediction.

But if it were up to me, I'd say rematch. You refusing a rematch gives NAiL the right to report a win, but he's not forced to do so. If the result of that is that the game is completely void, I have no problem with that.

You're just a great Mod. Nice to see that.
#823
Leagues Complaints / Re: t17 21400
March 18, 2010, 08:10 PM
If you void the game, just give the win to Dibz, it's just the same.

It's to easy to someone to report as a free win and then the game will be voided.
So if you think I was wrong, then give him the win.
#824
Leagues Complaints / Re: t17 21400
March 18, 2010, 12:53 PM
The BnG isn't an excuse.
I had the choice between replaying or taking the win: the BnG just made me take easly a choice.

If I said nothing, it's cause I just wanted to see if he would play the whole game in that cheap hide, or if he would teleport to another hide after I get really few hp (to be considered as a non-cheaper even if it is anyway: the way he chose to play), or if he would be fair and change hide.

Since I didn't teleport (since he took this hide is better), I had lost the game: if I teleported to a really cheaping hide, it was just to make him realize that he did the same from start, but he still was denying this fact.
If it's him, it's not cheap, but if it's his opponent, so it is (that's why I say he acts like his clanmate).

PS: If you mean the "fuk u" because I darksided (and wasn't a really darkside).
I just reminded him the rules, but as you saw, I didn't complain about it (even if it was possible).
Anyway, did I insulted him when he was playing cheaply ?

PSS:I'm sorry DarkOne, but Moderators have to decide a winner (I don't care if you say Dibz).
You can't just void that game.
#825
Leagues Complaints / Re: t17 21400
March 18, 2010, 12:06 PM
If he was a great player, I would have rematch without any problem.
But with his cheap behaviour the game before, and as I was clearly winning this game, this report his just a punishment (a allowed one).

PS: Beer, if you don't understand english, stop posting meaningless/useless posts please.

PSS: It's great to try to defend clanmates, but for first, defend him only when he is right.
And to finish, let the Moderators and the 2 concerned players talk only.
I wonder why Moderators don't do anything about this..