English
Search
Main Menu
Profile
Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - Dub-c

#1426
TUS Discussion / Re: Cheating
January 18, 2010, 08:08 PM
Does it matter?

Is using a program to play cheating?
#1427
TUS Discussion / Cheating
January 18, 2010, 07:56 PM
Is using a program to play worms cheating?
#1428
Schemes / Re: New rules for BnG
January 13, 2010, 08:16 AM
Ok, but what if someone plays not completely cheap, but much cheaper then you and beats you? Theres so many levels of what is cheap, what is playing properly that it doesn't work. You throw nades so they blow up on impact, the other guy throws nades so they bounce around your hide then blow. Its not a sitter, its legal. But cheap in many eyes.

What if two players are around the same skill. Who ever plays the cheapest is going to win then.



Its all stupid arguments that can not be avoided and never will be avoided no matter how much you try to define the rules.
#1429
Schemes / Re: New rules for BnG
January 12, 2010, 07:02 PM
Quote from: GodiTo on January 12, 2010, 01:01 PM
Well... No rules would ruins the game fun too......
No rules is good aswell, for some people.
But there should be very basic rules, what can understand by "zillians" too (As someone said).
Maybe we should set a poll ? I vote for yes to make a poll XD

w2's bng community has been playing for well over 10 years and dissagree's that bng with no rules ruins the fun. All those guys do is bng, no other schemes at all.

Quote from: beer on January 12, 2010, 12:58 AM
ae dub. lol
ckc is just agains evrything that u said :D, funny

I am my own man
#1430
Schemes / Re: New rules for BnG
January 12, 2010, 12:18 AM
w2 played bng with no rules now for ever. Not one argument. To me absolutely no rules is the best. 5 sec nades, sitters, and w/e.
#1431
TUS Discussion / Re: Roper changes
January 06, 2010, 11:54 PM
Quote from: Ray on January 06, 2010, 10:26 PM
Quote from: devilage on January 06, 2010, 06:11 AM
Ray my man.. UR so right! the player does not do anything! so ppl could just stay hide or move a bit then drop a wep and comeback to their hides! so the other player tries to do w2w to attack and if he falls the wussy that doesnt wanna w2w suddenly start to rope to get the fallen player, u see my point now? gives unfair advantage because one is trying to w2w to kill and the other its just moving a bit and hidding again.
Well, I still believe that if a less skilled player tries to do that with a better skilled player, the better skilled will have the patience and the experience to either succefully carry out an attack in almost every turn or hide to a different place where the opponent feels that he can attack him and either falls or attacks but runs out of time to hide back to the lame hide. This is what I believe with my experience in Roper, hehe.

Well the better roper should have more health by sudden death so he can just hide up top and then easily attack every turn. GG
#1432
TUS Discussion / Re: Roper changes
January 06, 2010, 05:32 PM
Quote from: MonkeyIsland on January 06, 2010, 12:41 PM
Quote from: Dub-c on January 06, 2010, 03:23 AM
OH since I mentioned w2, is there anyway to increase fall damage? That would add a lot more skill to the game.

Use TUS scheme editor. You can assign a big number for fall damage.

Don't think I'm smart enough to figure that out.
#1433
TUS Discussion / Re: Roper changes
January 06, 2010, 03:23 AM
Your right Dev, about the strategy of it all. I just don't believe that the sd strategy should be a part of a roper. Its not just a roper at that point, it becomes something else. I guess I'm just partial to the w2 ropers.

OH since I mentioned w2, is there anyway to increase fall damage? That would add a lot more skill to the game.
#1434
General discussion / Re: Looking for translator
December 16, 2009, 07:19 PM
Meu portugues muito domina. Sua mae e uma vaca, filho da puta! Chupa meu muito grande rolas de burro. Falow amigo
#1435
Less worms, more health?
#1436
Anyone know the meaning of "Classic"?
#1437
Quote from: beer on December 15, 2009, 09:34 PM
Quote from: Dub-c on December 15, 2009, 09:23 PM
Its just not a classic scheme, put it in a league with all fun schemes. Why not have wfw? bungee race? everything else then for tus
for exemple xtc and the last fb had hysteria in their scheme, and there wasnt any other league like free league, only one and it had hysteria. since is one of the most picked scheme why should it be in free?
BECAUSE its not a classic scheme. I never even heard of the damn scheme before I played this season
#1438
Its just not a classic scheme, put it in a league with all fun schemes. Why not have wfw? bungee race? everything else then for tus
#1439
What time is that est?
#1440
TdC / Re: crazy
December 12, 2009, 11:10 AM
Or just burn in image to cd . . . . .