I'm sick of chasing nikoo for our cup game. Instead of playing hes hosting rr's and playing random games and telling me later. I won our first game then he quit (2weeks ago?). He can chase me from now on.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Quote from: Komito on March 10, 2012, 06:14 AM
Dub is right but I think TuS has the layout of Bo games wrong.
Like, for example, they are playing Bo5, for 1 win, if it was 3-2, then reporting only 1 game is pretty bad because you played 5 games, you should be able to select "Best of 3/5/7/xx" so you can report all the games, but you won't have a loss against you, if you won the series.
Quote from: Devilage on March 10, 2012, 12:17 AM
I told him to report his 3 wins, and I'd report my two wins, told him the bo5 was more for a mental thing.
Quote from: Desetroyah on March 10, 2012, 04:48 AMQuote from: Dub-c on March 10, 2012, 02:38 AMQuote from: Desetroyah on March 10, 2012, 01:18 AMOk smart guy, you think im stupid? Umn they are similar in the amount of games played but imply different things and have different meanings. FYI a best of has always implied a series to determin a win. I see that went over your head.Quote from: Dub-c on March 09, 2012, 10:18 PM
Franz when you say first to two wins in no way can it be confused for best of 3.
what??? XD
FYI: first to 2 wins IS bo3 !!!
bo3 = best of 3 games = max amount of necessary wins is 2 = first to 2
unless its just a typo or something
aw goodie, drama time, I'll just take everything you said literally, "just cuz":
1) t for the compliment
2) not necessarily, I dont know you
3) "first to 2 wins" and "bo3" imply exactly the same thing, not something similar, 100% the one and the same
4) the-fyi-thing: ofc it went over my head since I'm apparently so much inferior to your incredible mental capacity but allow me to remark that considering there is no trophy for a 2-0/2-1 in TUS leagues, a "first to 2 wins" game instantly implies games for a single win, since no other single goal exists to be won. Only thing to complicate this would be a language barrier or a "foggy" (aka not crystal clear) conversation before the games as to the exact nature of the 1v1.
Enjoy
Quote from: Desetroyah on March 10, 2012, 01:18 AMOk smart guy, you think im stupid? Umn they are similar in the amount of games played but imply different things and have different meanings. FYI a best of has always implied a series to determin a win. I see that went over your head.Quote from: Dub-c on March 09, 2012, 10:18 PM
Franz when you say first to two wins in no way can it be confused for best of 3.
what??? XD
FYI: first to 2 wins IS bo3 !!!
bo3 = best of 3 games = max amount of necessary wins is 2 = first to 2
unless its just a typo or something