Kinda sucks to have ELO system in Clanners as there's not that much activity anyways...
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
#1277
ea / Re: Who owns who in elite? Challenges thread!
July 01, 2010, 07:42 PM
Updated!
Please reply if you have been challenged. Zippo, you will play against Hurenmeister?
Please reply if you have been challenged. Zippo, you will play against Hurenmeister?
#1278
ea / Re: Who owns who in elite? Challenges thread!
July 01, 2010, 07:37 PM
Sweet stuff.
I'll update the 1st post again.

#1279
Cups and Tournaments General / Re: Elite Cash Cup!!!
June 29, 2010, 08:51 PM
I'm in.
I could use the money.
10$ is perfect.
I could use the money.

10$ is perfect.
#1280
Leagues Games Comments / Re: Game #32174, Reported by Dulek
June 27, 2010, 01:54 PM
Lol man, your seriously not that special in Elite. And yes, Dulek is good.
Just good reaction based style, but try playing against Me or Crash or even Zippo and you see what it's like to CONTROL.
Just good reaction based style, but try playing against Me or Crash or even Zippo and you see what it's like to CONTROL.
#1281
Challenges Comments / Re: Map: NinjaCamel RR 14 in challenge #11
June 26, 2010, 04:16 PM
Hahah niiice

#1282
ea / Re: Who owns who in elite? Challenges thread!
June 25, 2010, 07:50 PM
Probably next week. I'm moving tomorrow.
#1284
ea / Re: Who owns who in elite? Challenges thread!
June 25, 2010, 02:02 PM
I challenged Doubletime. 5-0 for me. Gg's.
Not once did these games go to SD.
Not once did these games go to SD.
#1285
Leagues Games Comments / Re: Game #32017, Reported by Maciej
June 25, 2010, 09:32 AM
Their hides were too good. If we waste strike to open, they just girder.
#1286
Leagues Games Comments / Re: Game #31809, Reported by SpideR
June 24, 2010, 01:46 PM
ShyGuy didn't even play.
#1287
Leagues Games Comments / Re: Game #31809, Reported by SpideR
June 24, 2010, 12:57 PM
Avi, 5 minutes offline homing practise and you learn the basic angles. Gogogo.
#1288
ea / Re: Who owns who in elite? Challenges thread!
June 22, 2010, 12:17 PM
You should take the challenge Komo. You have elite vision. Just trust yourself.

#1289
Leagues General / Re: Updating leagues
June 22, 2010, 11:57 AM
Yeah, limiting games / season would actually hurt activity between some players, but I think it would boost all-round activity (more players). I don't mind singles that much anyways, since there's enough variation going on between players. My main point has been that most of the wormers just want to have fun while competing, so why restrict their picks.
I'd definately like to see things change in Clanners though, as they are pretty rare candy.
I'd definately like to see things change in Clanners though, as they are pretty rare candy.

#1290
Leagues General / Re: Updating leagues
June 22, 2010, 10:40 AM
Yeah, I agree it's hard to find good medium for everyone, but here's my take.
I don't like ELO-system at all, I think simple 2 pts for win, -1 for loss would be better for worming community. I see it would boost overall and seasonal activity (average wormers wanna compete also with their 1-2 strong schemes) and most importantly, it makes it more fun. Every season would be fresh start with the new hype going on amongst players.
You can pick the scheme you actually WANT TO play, that's the main idea here, for a wormer to have fun while competing. In TUS singles it's not that big of a problem because you can find variety in Singles often and quite fast, but in clanners it gets annoying sometimes. You're chilling with your clanm8 and you guys would like to play Elite against some clan but after you finally find a clan, you notice that you get too low points for it, you're forced to pick Hysteria/WxW instead, which weren't the schemes you actually WANTED TO PLAY.
ELO-system forces you to become all-round if you want to be successfull, but so would this system also. People pick their strongest scheme so you're forced to become good at them also if you want to make + points.
Were a small community and we just want to have fun while having a competition between us, why restrict the amount of fun we can have when we just want to play the scheme(s) we'd like. There would be still tactical picks going on and all that jizz.
I don't like ELO-system at all, I think simple 2 pts for win, -1 for loss would be better for worming community. I see it would boost overall and seasonal activity (average wormers wanna compete also with their 1-2 strong schemes) and most importantly, it makes it more fun. Every season would be fresh start with the new hype going on amongst players.
You can pick the scheme you actually WANT TO play, that's the main idea here, for a wormer to have fun while competing. In TUS singles it's not that big of a problem because you can find variety in Singles often and quite fast, but in clanners it gets annoying sometimes. You're chilling with your clanm8 and you guys would like to play Elite against some clan but after you finally find a clan, you notice that you get too low points for it, you're forced to pick Hysteria/WxW instead, which weren't the schemes you actually WANTED TO PLAY.

ELO-system forces you to become all-round if you want to be successfull, but so would this system also. People pick their strongest scheme so you're forced to become good at them also if you want to make + points.
Were a small community and we just want to have fun while having a competition between us, why restrict the amount of fun we can have when we just want to play the scheme(s) we'd like. There would be still tactical picks going on and all that jizz.