@Guaton @Rok, nice to see you around You know you don't need a thread like this to popup and say a few words, right?

23 years old, 2007

Hello, welcome to TUS. Give us the link to your scheme so we can check. Your scheme should be set to "public" first. You can go to your scheme edit page and set it to public.

It's not hard to bring it to life at this point. Maybe I'll surprise you. Who knows

Godmax, keep the language clean on the forums.

That's cool but I'm dropping the support for old browsers soon.

This style is common. Usually the map maker is teenager as you said and the content is "Collage" of what they watch.

------------------- Lie detector Scanner (read with robotic voice) ---------------------

.... Scanning for possible lies.... Found user... Sensei .... with lying background....
.... Scanning message content ........ Found possible lie content ....  "Jago killing it"...
.... Analyzing candidate content .... Killing means to take something/somebody's life. Did Jago actually take somebody's life .... No... *BEEEP* LIE *BEEEP*  LIE....
.... Sending report ... to Karen ...
.... Awaiting next post ....

King-Gizzard, good job I guess you only need to change clouds then ^^

But you didn't defend BnG in this thread. None of the community members have a problem with the phrase "pure feel" or "I don't measure". We all know what it means. You took a simple casual term and analyzed its words literally to prove there's no such thing as "pure feel". Now you have proof that Sensei lied. We didn't buy it though but you made yourself happy with that discovery.

Sensei is not lying here. You are obsessing over technicality and interpreting too much. "Pure feel" is an acceptable term and we all know what it means. Instead of calculating sprites/notches, we aim/fire with our gut feeling. Yes that "gut" also has internal subconscious calculations behind it, but there's nothing wrong with labeling it as "pure feel". You know it too I don't know why I'm explaining this. On the other hand, chasing Sensei like this calling him a liar doesn't look good on you.

It's fixed.

It's a private cup for ICB members. Only members of ICB clan can join.

I'm locking this thread. I don't see it going anywhere useful.

If it is an argument about the 3rd game match, the suggested scheme can be refused. If it is a new pair of league matches, you can't reject any schemes. So Lupastic is correct if the negotiation is about 2 new schemes to play.