xD

rofl end

too late sorry, delete other game? he'll loose even less points then, its better for him

Ok ill upload the replay onto recent games

He won a ttrr and so did I, dont think he reported his. Must have reported the wrong one by mistake.

Ah ok thanks for clearing that up MI, + well done intergrating the overall rating on the season stats page.

Another +1 for you!

lol ^

Quote from: Rok on July 30, 2009, 11:52 AM

Quote from: NAiL on July 30, 2009, 04:19 AM
How do the current league ratings relate to the overall ratings?

Is the same amount of points added/subtracted to your overall rating for whichever scheme?

How many points are then added to your overall rating?

The points added/subtracted are calculated from overall rating (which is different for every scheme, depending on how well one did so far in a given scheme). These points are then added to season rating (you can also call it season score, if you want), which is reseted every season to 1000. Overall ratings are not reseted. Amount of points added/subtracted can be viewed in analyzer.

Thanks for replying rok and mi, but you didnt answer my question.

What I mean is, if I win 40 points for an elite match, I realise that my seasonal elite ranking will go up by 40 points, but will 40 points also be added to my overall elite rating?

How many of these 40 points will be added to my overall seasonal rating, and how many will be awarded to my overall OVERALL rating?

Whilst the analyser tells you how many points will be awarded to your seasonal rating for an individual scheme, it does not show you how much your overall seasonal rating will increase by.

It also tells you nothing about how much your overal rating for a scheme will incerase by, nor how much your overall overall rating will increase by. Seeing as OVERALL ratings are as importnat as seasonal ratings regarding PO qualifications, it is vital that this information is displayed on the analyser page!!!

You also said "inactiveness is a downside I agree".

Inactiveness kills leagues, its not a downside, its a CRITICAL side. If the current way of doing things promotes inactivness (which it does), then surely it is better to change the system to promote activeness!!!

Thanks.

Good Monkey.

I have some more questions.

How do the current league ratings relate to the overall ratings?

Is the same amount of points added/subtracted to your overall rating for whichever scheme?

How many points are then added to your overall rating?

It would be good to display this information on the analyser page... seeing as your ranking in the overall standings is as important for PO qualification as your rankings are for the current season, I thought that would be obvious.

I still dont think that the current system works out fairly enough, especially given the current inactiveness of worms.

The point differences do not work out fairly because a large chunk of the big ratings are held be inactive players. These players just sit at the top of the standings having not played a game for months... This means that the few active players with high overall rankings are the only ones people can win really big points from. This causes noob avoiding, which is even worse than noob bashing because it causes INACTIVENESS! People will not play league schemes if they stand too loose alot of points and gain virtually nothing for a long period of time!

I think it would be far better to reset the seasonal ratings every month and use these ratings to work out how many points should be won or lost in a match. Keep the overal data for sure, but its silly to reset the seasonal ratings and use the "overal" ratings to calcuatate the points difference.

You can see that the current system doesnt give an ACCURATE of a players skill level, worms is too inactive for this overal rating system to work!

Hope that made sense, Ill respond with more detail when im less tired and can focus a bit better!

ahahah wooka yeh,

but TUS can be confuing, I mean loads of people still dont know how to report clanners!

Good to see you always working ont he league Monkey, nobody can deny your dedication to the league!

Quote from: Chicken23 on July 26, 2009, 06:20 PM
wouldnt it be nice to display the overall rating and not the seasonal one?

I agree, this is what is confusing, becasue you think someone will have a higher rating than they actually do if you only look at the seasonal ratings.

Also, you should advertise the overall standings using the term "overall standings"!

What I mean by this is that your choice of term to describe the overall standings is "show me all together, confuse me".

This doesnt really indicate the importance of these stanings, in fact it encourages the player to not select this menu despite its vast relevance to the league!!

I also think it would be better to display the players qualifying for PO positions all on the front page. Otherwsie people have to select multiple pages of stats for BOTH the current season standings and also the "show me all together, confuse me" standings.

I understand the rating system now, although think that display wise, it could be better executed, with less pages of data to flick through in order to find out basic information!

Aye ty, but inactive players are just gonna stay at the top of the overall standings, for example Mir is 1st for elite, hes not moving!

Its confusing because it compares the ratings of the "overal" league. This doesnt make sense... if I loose to artharas at elite i will only gain 21 points and loose 79.... and artharas is rated 1st in the elite rankings for this season... even though he lost 4 and won 5 games!!! This is confusing and doesnt make sense...

Top 4 players taken from current season standings, and top 4 players taken from overal league standings!

This is very different from xtc and is quite confusing! Doesnt seem to work at giving consistantly fair rating changes!