update this, we have more new members, they are missing xD

vn

Quote from: Tomi on May 07, 2013, 06:32 PM
we should really start to use teamspeak ^^ boring bngs could be not so boring

I always want to use TeamSpeak

Arsgoetia vs Berria and Fada xD

Bl position kaleu xDDD

Quote from: Tomi on May 05, 2013, 11:41 AM
Ah guys, don't take it so serious..

I think they are new guys here. They surely didn't know that they can ask for "clanner except wxw".

The players who are here for a long time won't do this mistake

This situation is just so unimportant, that it doesn't need a 3-pages long topic

problem is when ''the clan'' is choosing both schemes or only one, for example coI is ''only'' t17, shopper and wxw, we tried to play wxw and they refused, so will be only shopper n t17??? luckiest schemes? c'mon, that's ridiculous, this is a league, they are just betting to luck, they have to learn first all schemes before start asking for league games ... or well ... at least try to play with some clans and learn all schemes with experience, cuz they seem like SkZ bitches ...

And dude, they may be a 'young' clan, but they're not new players, they have their time playing, just look their register and i saw when they play individual games, they have played every scheme ... so why not in clanner?

Quote from: Mayhem on May 05, 2013, 08:10 AM

Quote from: Komito on May 05, 2013, 07:54 AM


Also, sm0k has an extremely good point, technically, these ridiculous rules mean we can ALL abuse the TuS points system, keep our points safe by avoiding whoever the hell we want @ whatever we want.

Anyone can avoid at any time, simply dont answer the "TUS anyone?". Someone Pm's you asking "clanner?" dont answer. You are in PO position and don't want to lose position by risking a loss in a clanner, simply dont answer, there are lots of ways to avoid. some are more viewable than others.

About this, they are not just ignoring, they are ASKING FOR clanner, there are a big diference between pick ''faster'' schemes than only such scheme, as well as asking for only '' default schemes'' or only ''rope schemes'' (here we have the chance to choose lol), they are picking both schemes ... is similar when for example im in ag asking for clanner ... and then appear any clan '' hey we clanner host up'' and then I ''ok, we will only roper n ttrr'' and maybe u wanna play other scheme ... here is when at least I THINK im losing the right to pick ... because they are simply picking what they want to play, not for time, not for ''disability'', just for they want to play it ...

QuoteYou can play the scheme you want. You can ask "clanner Team17 anyone?" and only play Team17. It is based on agreement. You CAN'T refuse your opponent's pick when they have played yours. But before the start of the games, yes you can talk to them to reach an agreement.

some cases that's not an agreement, sometimes we're forced to play ''that'' scheme cuz there're no more players to play FAIRLY, and obviously this kind of avoiding affect us and for me that's afraid to lose points, and it should be considered like avoiding opponent pick, if they want to play only t17, they can host a game called ''t17'' and find a player that's what they are looking for no? just play one scheme? why we have to support those players that don't like other schemes?, what kind of competitiveness we have if one is deciding what we have to play?...

if u see currently clan league is totally inactive, there's no ''variety'' of clans anymore, and when we've got a clan asking for clanner (after hours looking for) they have to decide what we have to play? that's unfair man...

If they want to play clanner or leagues games, they have to play based on basic rule, 1 scheme per player or clan ...

QuoteAt the rest of the topic,
Forcing a rule like that, will backfire you know? I can set that rule and force a clan to not escape my TTRR pick. They will probably tell me to report free win. A number of those free wins get reported and people will start calling that lame. Then we go on and set another rule to ban free wins like that and force that clan to play TTRR with us. Now do you think that forced game is any different than the free win they just gave us?

I supppose the option ''free win'' was created in order to report a game where the opponent just ''give it up'' why should it be lame? the lame player will be the player who is surrending without playing...

Quote from: Dub-c on May 04, 2013, 07:03 AM

Quote from: franz on July 04, 2012, 09:38 PM
Avoiding rule:
If you only want to play a specific scheme/type, you must make this clear when asking for clanners or risk getting an avoid complaint.

This is wrong and needs to be changed. Asking for specific schemes in a rating based all-around league is just incongruous. IT IS A LEAGUE! If you only want to play certain schemes then you should stick to playing funners.

Im totally agree with u dub, this MUST BE CHANGED, as u told, this is a competitive league and both clans or individual players must choice what they want to pick, a pick for each one whatever they pick, this leagues is not based on '' i will decide what we gonna play '' that's totally unfair... what would happen if everyone here start saying '' TUS NE1? only such scheme'' ? opponents will lose their right to choice, and mostly of the cases, opponent refuses that ''he/she'' decide what the opponent HAS TO play... and this affect obviously the player with balls to reach to first place or PO...

Dedicated to u Deejay, 9:52 ;P !!

Quote from: avirex on April 23, 2013, 01:44 AM
dont pay any attention to ropa, hhc...


he just likes to be a "i told you so" type of guy, the type no one likes.

T17 is the most useless scheme for league ever created ... I know, maybe it has years being played .... but c'mon, it's a game that takes at least 20+ min per game,  and when u least expect it, yes, it finished with a draw, lets repeat another 20+ min and hope it doesn't finish with a draw again .... and here, is when conflicts arise, cuz it is a tired and bored game so opponents refuse to repeat it once again ... however i will not generalize , there are games that end before SD (i suppose are minimal)

Maybe t17 needs skills , i will not say it is just luck, but c'mon, most of t17 players (im included) try to take cr8s in first turns, (obviously, if u've got a dyna and worm close u hit them...)  and then when u've got a ''SD weapon'' lets take a corner side, burn time and go for SD... and well... pray the opponent doesn't force a draw... that's the basic strategy of this game ... as i told in other post , i would like to see a percent of draws in t17, i don't think that's possible but well ... an approximate percentage would be nice ... for me 40% of t17 finishes in draw, and this is a lower number ...

I'm not in list :DDDDD

i'd rather t17 out than hyst ''banned'' ... most of the times t17 takes 20 - 30 min to finish, and then, if there's not a sd weapon, it probably will a draw ... that's fking stupid ,,, how can a game depend on ''sd'' weapons? i would like to see how many games have finished before and after sd .... prolly after sd will take 85% of games ..

Quote from: Fenice on March 20, 2013, 02:22 AM
Please, remove this game: https://www.tus-wa.com/leagues/game-141728/, it was reported twice, my bad.

10:05 , not an awesome shot, but it was nice ;P

i wanna join ea, i like Elite   

Quote from: DJ-M4R10 on March 15, 2013, 06:37 PM
xDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD maes lamers xDDDDd

Hahahahaha my first bng's played hahaha, was a very nice game , i don't even know how to throw 5s lg nades xD only 4s bouncing nades, hahaha i laugh alot watching again this game hahaha, vado saying to komo ''noob'' and ''kick'' using /anon xDDD