Quote from: Random00 on May 21, 2010, 04:45 PM2. You shouldnt be able to reach POs with just being good at 1 or 2 schemes. (means you win 85%+ at these schemes and have like 50% winnings in the other schemes)
That is actually a really nice thought. The league is all-around after all, so I would love to see what happens if the PO qualifications required 60% winning percentage in each scheme!
Quote from: Komo on May 28, 2010, 05:54 PM
Personally I think if you care THAT MUCH about reaching playoffs, just reset your rank every season...
You cannot reset your rank every season, since we had similar cheap incident in the past, and now you cannot reset if your rank is higher than 1000.
Quote from: Komo on May 28, 2010, 05:54 PM
Or spend the time reaching the top 4.
I think currently Random is the best player around and even he could not manage it in the last season...
Let me sort of sum up the ideas that I love in this topic and I support (and seemingly the majority does):
1. Showing the overall ranks as default. I would put that to a separate link, with no Time Machine in the corner and no pages, just showing all the players based on the overall standings. A link called Ladder maybe, or something else.
2. Increasing the length of the season to 60 days and the number of Play-off participants to 16, with 12 players qualified by the seasonal points and 4 players by the overall.
3. Include the restriction of winning percentage for each scheme, as mentioned above.
4. One week for each round of the PO, with a nice counter. Also, I wouldn't show the PO participants of the current season by default, rather the previous season's PO, and since the counter and the more strict rules would make it sure that the PO finishes within a month, there is no point showing how the next PO would look like, because not enough players meet the requirements until that point anyway, or it's very likely to change.
