OK, time to dig up this old thread.
Some rumours say that now, that we clearly reached the point to see how the system's rating pattern works, there are some people complaining about it. That wouldn't be a problem itself, since there are always people who are not satisfied, the problem is that we can hear about that more and more...

THIS masterpiece as for the latest example...

I also think that it is fair to lose more points against less skilled people, but not as many as it is currently.

My suggestion: change the amount of points moving between the games. This number is currently 80, that's how we get 40-40 points for two equally rated players. If we reduced this number to 60 or 50 for instance, the outcome of players with a huge difference between them could be a lot less drastic.

Now the fact is that TaG reported with a valid replay and it's log says it was played after the replay you attached here. Listen, I am not a detective, I really don't know what is going on here but I cannot delete that game just because you show up one more replay.

No other clanners were reported before those games between you so they could not have swapped those replays.

These two games were played on the same day, with 2 hours of difference. So... What is the other replay?

Read before posting. 

Moreover, there are plenty of more refined ways to let us know your feelings, such as:

• giving us ideas instead of reaming our ass out
• trying to actually understand what this is about, and if you seem unable to do so, we are always here to answer your questions

Now go to the discuss topic of the problem, you might be interested in that. 

I think I get your point here.

Hmm... Maybe deleting the game should not be the solution, if it was the first time, then Gonzo should be warned... My opinion.

As for the grammar corrections: bicycle.

Bah, yea. Monkey will edit that as soon as possible. Thanks!

I use G15 and I would want to sleep with it every night, I love it so much. It is just perfect.

Then maybe... Renaming the Activity Stats and displaing them on the same page like standings? Like on WormOlympics.
Ahh no, that sounds silly and even more confusing...
But you know, on WormOlympics, when checking out the Country Standings, you get what we call here Activity Stats for Countries. This could also work here, but the problem is that we have clanners, so that results in two different clan standings... I get my coffee then edit my post.

Alright, then I must have misunderstood you NAiL. ;o

That's why it should be different, moreover, it doesn't look cool in the time machine to see N/A...

I think the Country games are just as inactive as the Free League, in my opinion, it should be closed, since if two players want to play together without being in the same clan, they can still play 2v2 games and there is even a bigger possibility to find two people who want to play not being in the same country.

Suggestion: the country stats of the seasons should be replaced with the "Activity Stats" of the countrys.
Deal?

Quote from: NAiL on October 19, 2009, 11:22 PM2: Instead of labeling the seasons in an informal manner, why not have a list of the players who finished 1st 2nd and 3rd for each season next to the season link?

E.g. "Take me to season 6: 1st NAiL  2nd ZiPpO  3rd Godito"

Monkey, I think NAiL meant the first three of the standings of the season, not with the Playoffs results, because you have that now. Or am I wrong?

It is right too, Unique played 30 games in 2 days and the season lasts for 60 days... I could imagine even more games as limit, 75 for instance.
And reset should work for anyone under 1000 only, they would have the limits which are used right now, but noone under no circumstances could use the reset option with higher than 1000 points.