Quote from: darKz on December 12, 2013, 11:58 AM

Imagine these two scenarios:
1.) CF has an internal agreement, we all meet up on Ventrilo and join WormNET only as a group when we're all ready and want to play clanners.
2.) CF is prick teasing

FTFY.

Quote from: Komito on December 08, 2013, 09:05 AM
LMFAO how pathetic is that, he won 4 trophies and the highest he got was 3rd place LOL !

Why the hell would you brag about something so ridiculously easy to achieve, 10th & 8th place LOL what a f@#!ing joke haha !

Quoting just in case you realize your mistake.

Hint: Those are season numbers.

Now something unbiased where you all fail.

Quote from: barman on November 28, 2013, 10:38 AM
Now try to name the American states. No cheating

I'd probably be able to name 15-20 at most

I'd do better than that.

That guy from the video can't even read, doh. "Hungry". And I'd still do that chick

17.000 km? Are you gonna stop by in Texas, or what? 

Quote from: darKz on October 26, 2013, 12:44 PM
classified

Chuckle'd. Classified.

Quote from: avirex on October 27, 2013, 04:47 PM
I would be a millionaire

What's in it for the "app maker"? 

Cherrs, Sbaffo, which one is you?

Best wishes for ya, mate

No, there was no such rule in TUS leagues.

Quote from: DarkOne on July 22, 2013, 05:55 PM
There's something odd about your table there, Rok. Why is Statik's win over _ssm_ only 1-0 while Random's win over _ssm_ is 2-0? Same applies to Berria's win while I'm at it, so that would put them both at 4 round wins. Round losses is a different matter, though, Statik would win that.

Typo, I guess. Doesn't change a thing, though, they're tied.

Quote from: HHC on July 22, 2013, 04:57 PM
Given that you're not participating in this cup, nor are a cup mod, you have no business here making drama.

That's not worth responding to.

Quote from: HHC on July 22, 2013, 04:57 PM
On the subject: it's not true. Berria played ssm this morning, after the deadline had passed and after statik had finished his game.
There are drawbacks to the system, I can see that, but all ways to settle draws do have 'em. What if Statik's opponents weren't motivated anymore to finish their games. Would it be right to kick Statik out even though he was never able to finish his matches?

My bad, I looked top-to-bottom insted bottom-up.

Quote from: HHC on July 22, 2013, 04:57 PM
People tend to solve this with extending deadlines, which may be right, but it does delay everything. The group stage was already delayed a full week. If I have to choose between 1-0 and 1-1 I go for 1-0 as the better record. That may benefit the inactive player, but IMO it's a better record than 1-1.

You can't even meaningfully compare 1-0 and 1-1, not in a round-robin group where all games are supposed to happen.  You can chose to discard the game that was reported after the deadline. Then it's 1:0 for statik and 0:1 for berria. Can you accurately tell who did better given that they didn't play against the same opponents? I don't think so.

The best you can IMO do here is assign results of games that didn't happen as draws.

You then get

              Random00   Berria   Statik  ssm
Random00      X             2         1       2     = 5
Berria             1              X         1      1     = 3
Statik             1              1         X       1    = 3
ssm                0              0         0       X    = 1

Still a tie.

That's ridiculous.

Given that berria played both his games before statik played his first one, statik had no incentive to play his second game (quite the contrary, playing with random00 could've made situtation worse for him if he lost 2:0). He just needed to wait for the deadline.

Yeah, HHC, what's up with that?