Bit soul less imo to get piled up with random people which i probably don't even know to do clan games which always require certain team play aspects. One of the main thrills for me when i do clanners is to give everything for my clan, like in a football match where the players give everything for their clubs. That would completely fall away here i guess. I also doubt that it would be good for the activity in TUS clan league which isn't so great anyway nowadays... too much stuff on TUS anyway that holds people off from clanning.

Quote from: Free on July 23, 2010, 12:56 PM
Who cares?

Apparently not you so why don't you stick ur opinion where the sun don't shine. Seriously when i read shit like this i get a retardness-allergy...

I should be 2nd in group 2 imo.

Yeah but the program code would have to be changed in order to do a new ranking system i guess... no point in bringing a system back which already has been proved hackable lol.

Well that would mean that the patchers would have to re-write the whole ranks stuff wouldn't it? As far as i know it had been hacked in the past... i don't think that it is likely to happen...

Jesus, how can you guys have the patience to discuss 3 pages over this case... so obvious even for non-involved people that Crash ended WA.exe task... but then, not surprising if ppl do stuff like that if they don't have to fear any kind of punishment...

You must be deaf, there's clicks!

Yeah, just wanted to say that probably the mods wont start another cup now. The cups simply take too long with extended deadlines and stuff...

Open up a poll, fair enough. About the cup thing: i think there are too many unfinished cups to start another one...

Camel coz cute.

Zipp0 or David Hasselhoff??

Could have done it in 5 turns but messed up the end of course.

Quote from: ShyGuy on July 17, 2010, 08:43 PM
EDIT: I shall also ask the people of worms this... In the league scheme now, you can get a crate on the far side of the map, impossible to rope even with perfect roping and every rope connection the best, get the crate, and attack. Why, I ask, do you accept a scheme where you have a chance to not be able to attack at all depending on where the game engine decides to put the crate?  How does anyone see this as good?  Stop letting the game engine decide the outcome of the game!

Good point, but that would be valid for most schemes actually. I think of being able to reach an otherwise unreachable worm in elite with max strong wind or being able to knock a worm out of his hide, maybe even being able to knock it towards a barrel if a crate falls right beside you in shoppa. Fact is people will always complain about luck involved may the scheme be oh so perfect.

Well as i already said i need to play some games with this scheme to see what it's like. Don't see a reason why it couldn't co-exist with the normal roper scheme though, another rope scheme would only be a benefit for the league. Especially with all those crappy hysteria picks nowadays...

Thanks for the replay, getting a better picture now... although i must say that i don't really see the decrease of crate luck in this scheme, u still can get some pretty lucky crates and be able to attack + grab a crate frequently while ur opponent gets hard crates. Edit: Of course you always can interspere a turn in which you pick up the left alone crates, seems to me more like a synthetic extension of the game time though. This would imo more even out the difference in skill between 2 players than to profit the better player.... From what i see is that it'll add some tactical elements which the actual roper scheme doesn't have. Gotta get used to the not being able to hide properly with 5 sec retreat time tho also.

Summary for me: Looks interesting but i guess i need to play a few games to judge if it's rly superior to the "standard" roper scheme...

Quote from: Komo on July 16, 2010, 10:33 AM
Quite alot of people still use FB shopper and wxw scheme, as do I and it's pretty decent, but seeing as FB and TuS only schemes I used for league matches in these schemes I don't really have a valid opinion, but alot of people seem to like the FB schemes for Shopper/WxW.

Either that, or just put the crate drop ratio down on the worse items? I don't know lol, but I agree that the crates are kinda weird, I got 4 prods in a TuS shopper once, and like lots of bows.

FB shoppa scheme has a lot of super weapons actually... i usually delete them from the scheme which makes it quite ok for me. I guess if TUS would tweak the FB schemes a bit and take them people would be happier with those all in all.

I would REALLY appreciate if you took the Team17 FB scheme at least, TUS one, excuse me, sucks hard.

Trying to cheat on the own team mate... LOL