You could ask reN nicely to just start all over again, as a new WxW, to put this all behind you both. If not, I'm leaning more toward letting the game stand due to how much was played in that last replay.

amazing you even called it, wow

Reminder: FINAL deadline - SATURDAY, April 20th
almost 6 week(s) in now -> less than 3 week(s) left for FINAL


Lukz #3/Impossible #5, times?

cFc #1/dt #2, confirmed Saturday 6th at 20 GMT?

again, haven't seen Maciej #AG all day, even left snoop open for him

Quote from: Impossible on March 30, 2013, 09:02 PM
bry4n pwned

edit: btw is it possible to fix this bug, Im 4th on classic league season 30 standing, not 5th https://www.tus-wa.com/leagues/classic-standings/

You can pm MI to see what he wants to do, my understand is one of your complaints was only recently solved, causing the shift. https://www.tus-wa.com/forums/leagues-complaints/tus-wa-com-leagues-game-135623-18967/

brutal

I'd take this more seriously if it didn't take place right after closing the last complaint, as you're both clearly just messing with each other now.  You guys can have fun with each other, but not at the expense our complaint process.

Quote from: franz on July 04, 2012, 09:38 PM
Avoiding rule:
If someone is avoiding, you must save screen shots as proof and post them in a complaint thread.  Mods will discuss and if they agree, you can report a free win and that gives the avoider one week of time to play that game.  In the case of a clan avoiding, only the players online at the time of the avoid can play.

Waiting for a specific lineup before even asking for a clanner is still perfectly okay.  Openly asking for clanners but then refusing to play a clan is not okay.  If you only want to play a specific scheme/type, you must make this clear when asking for clanners or risk getting an avoid complaint.

Without seeing CAT openly asking for clanner, I don't see anything here.  Sorry.

Maybe remove drill from bng?  Kind of agree with those above.

Other than that though, do you want to keep this open MI?

Do you want to keep this open MI?

I defer to other mods to handle bng complaints, but looks like this was missed for quite a while.

"- Girders may be used for bouncing purposes only. Destroy the girder before continuing if placed incorrectly."

If that's been the same rule since this game, I'm guessing the literal interpretation would mean you can't teleport behind the girder, and if you do, you need to destroy it (right?), which Rivivia didn't do.  Or is the rule only valid until teleporting away? (seems like a bad loophole though).  Again I defer to other mod opinions.

I understand your frustration, but keep offering times till the deadline.  I've noticed Bry4N's delays, but you also can't just sit back in the last week and not offer any more.  Be proactive, and you'll be just fine.  Bry4N will need to show extra effort to save himself though.

Reminder: Round2 deadline - SUNDAY, March 31st  (Clans FINAL deadline - SATURDAY, April 20th)
almost 5 week(s) in now -> less than 1 week(s) left for Round2  (less than 4 week(s) left for Clans FINAL)


Bry4N #2/Impossible #5, last chance, both risk kick, no new times since Sunday

cFc #1/dt #2, confirmed Saturday 30th at 20 GMT?

Quote from: Maciej on March 21, 2013, 05:31 PM
I will be available in Saturday, be around guys, here or on AG, I will catch you.

haven't seen Maciej #AG all day, looks like he played MI earlier, then never came back I guess

I think what you're describing Anubis is likened more to a simple Ladder system, which actually has been done before back in the day actually.  Just google 'worms 2 ladder' and you'll find the old Case's Ladder: Worms 2: B&G standings and Worms 2: Roperz subdivision as well.  In that system (taken from their Rules page):

-When you defeat a member that is ranked higher on the Ladder, you move up in rank half the distance between their rank and your own.

-Your rank on the Ladder does not go down if you lose a match unless your opponent is ranked DIRECTLY below you.

-When members ranked below you are victorious against members ranked above you, it's possible the member will jump over you in rank and you will move down one rung. This depends on the ranks involved.

It's not necessarily all that bad of a system, in lots of cases it can be great, but as you can see --> these were for specialized one scheme standings, so such a system would likely not be a great overall system for a collection of schemes like we do for Classic.