Quote from: Random00 on August 03, 2012, 05:24 PM
then lets try next wednesday (8th august), 19:00 GMT?
yup works for me, cya then ;p
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Quote from: Random00 on August 03, 2012, 05:24 PM
then lets try next wednesday (8th august), 19:00 GMT?
Quote from: Random00 on August 03, 2012, 02:21 PM
sock, how about sunday, between 18:00 and 22:00 GMT?
Quote from: franz on July 23, 2012, 12:15 AM
damn, nice and close. 55 / 54
but some bl here. sock you lost 1.42 sec at the start of your first 55 run. slacker!
Quote from: LalosDich on July 20, 2012, 11:33 PM
Quite interesting read Free, thanks for that
But I still just see it as another "theory" that some "humans" have thought up, and if it were true what you say, I wouldn't like that reality... I think it'd suck lol.
Quote from: Ramone on July 20, 2012, 11:29 PMQuote from: sock on July 20, 2012, 11:17 PM
Sure it's in context, if you see it just as a reply to abnax
Dunno how do U see it, but we're both out of context after Free's post..
And where have U find the context at the first place? It's a God/religion debate, can't expect any context there, can U? ;x
Quote from: DarkOne on July 20, 2012, 11:01 PMQuote from: sock on July 20, 2012, 10:40 PM
Hmm... I'll make my conclusion on what I know, and what I think know is you might have taken this out of context.
The supernatural thing is something I saw in several posts and I see it used a bit too often for my taste as "proof" of something someone believes in.
The first thing: just look at Abnaxus' post
Quote from: Ramone on July 20, 2012, 11:08 PM
It's not out of context, I see it as a reply to Abnax, no? ;x
Quote from: DarkOne on July 20, 2012, 10:13 PM
I sincerely have a problem with people trying to make their point with "look at what we don't know!". If you can't make your point with things you know/can explain/can reason, then you don't have a point.
We make our conclusions on the things we know, not on the things we don't know. If we're going to make conclusions based on what we don't know, then nobody can function at any job/project/hobby/whatever. It's not a hasty conclusion if all the evidence points to a certain conclusion.
About using "supernatural" as an argument. Can anyone explain the difference between supernatural and magic? If you can't explain it, then that means you would be using magic as an argument - do you really want to do that?