English
Search
Main Menu
Profile

Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - zippeurfou

#361
Promotion Project / Re: worms streaming bot
April 15, 2013, 11:41 PM
It is possible avirex and actually not that complicated I believe if you use something as twitch. Then come the question of which game should be in streaming. I don't think "random" games are any interesting and play in favor of the game advertisement. Moreover, it requires a server that can capture the game which mean use of graphic and cpu. So you need to find someone willing to lend this. Anyways, this is a good idea and I'm sure we should listen to what cybershadow and DC think about it.
#362
TUS Discussion / Re: Should lagouts be reported?
April 15, 2013, 07:29 PM
lagout should be reported as win :p
#363
TUS Discussion / Re: Matchmaking
April 15, 2013, 07:27 PM
Well, I had this idea a while back also. It was a slight alternative idea where you could set your status as looking for a tus single/clanner (with specific needs like only rope/no rope/hysteria only...) and you'd see how many people are looking for tus and you could just do that matchmaking right after.
I liked that idea but then someone said truly that there's already AG for that and I remember it didn't work that well in past..So I dropped my idea :)
#364
dS / Re: Chelseas dumbass Avoider thread 2
April 14, 2013, 01:36 AM
huheuhhue horray for husk da avoider :D
It might be related by the fact that husk=dog and dog don't mix up with cat :D
#365
really awesome maps. Never considered making other scheme map?
#366
TdC / Re: mekka to the jews
April 13, 2013, 03:13 PM
hf redi :)
#367
to sum up this game:
[HuskyTdC] it's like paralympics
#368
common rash let's join this cup together.
We'll show them how to loose a game like a pro ! :D
#369
eww roper :(. My space doesn't work well at all :(
#370
TdC / Re: mekka to the jews
April 10, 2013, 12:59 AM
haha have fun redi ! :)
Try to not smoke too much :D
#371
nice edit indeed !
#372
Off Topic / Re: poker advice
April 09, 2013, 12:40 PM
Thanks dub, I'll do it in the futur.
No king,  you're wrong but let's not debate this here please.
Nope ropa, this was a tourney and let's be frank these 3 draw (including both where I raise by a lot during the blind) was the big one during all the night.
#373
Off Topic / Re: poker advice
April 09, 2013, 05:06 AM
First, thanks for your answers and sorry for the english.
Shyguy, on the table we were about 8 people. After the initial bet we were 3. So I believe the initial bet wasn't that bad. The other man standing did a all in with jack queen. He was out of the game after this one. So basically, it was only him and me.
I was the one leading sock. He was almost all in while I still had some chips (but not enough after this to compete seriously with him. If I had to put weight I'd say that the average table had 2, he had 6 and I had 9 since he put almost all in and I called it hurts me really bad).
Franz, I agree with you and must admit that I don't totally recall exactly all the card on the table but what I am sure of is that there was no potential color and that I wasn't worried about the straight (which I agree is not enough information by itself).
Franz, thanks for your advice. As you said, my memory here is a problem which is not really helping at all. As I said, somehow I wasn't worried about straight. It might be possible the straight was possible with the river. Anyhow, do you think after several hours someone who is second in the chips will raise that hard betting all on one card or a straight of low card straight from the blind ? I just thought it was very unlikely.
To be honest this guy after this was in his lucky day. He got a straight flush later on and other very low probability card. But before he won most of his coins by raising in sort of the other fold and he didn't have to show his cards and mostly when he had to he lost it. That's why in my opinion I felt wrongly confident. I guess my problem here was that I couldn't imagine that someone would follow me on the blind and not have high card and I felt to confident then with my kk.
It's indeed hard to ask how would you guy reacted judging that you weren't there. Folding wasn't easy either. As you said Franz and as I said, I could see that he was trying to get more chips out of me but still, would you guys have fold ? My problem to be honest is that even now if the same situation come by I'm not sure it is the smartest thing to fold.
Anyhow, tomorrow I have another tourney. If I see a delicate case like this one I'll report it here so we can discuss about it (and this time with better details). 
#374
Off Topic / poker advice
April 09, 2013, 02:05 AM
Hey guys,
I was playing poker the other day and I was winning hard on the table when I lost almost everything in one draw.
Since some of you seems to be very good poker gambler I'd like to know what you'd have done (same or not ?). This topic is just in order to have some inexperienced player getting advice from "real" experienced people in order to improve their overall skills about actual real case. Please if you're not an experienced player just don't give advice. I myself won 2 tourney (not big one just you know some bar tourney with 20 people) and I am seeking advice from someone experienced not someone who just play for fun.
So here is the case:
Context:
I am leading the table. I've been taking down 4 players in the last 30 minutes and so I assume I am somehow "feared". Since I am leading the table hard and I don't want anyone to catch up with me I decide to enter in a "semi" bluff strat for the next two draw if I have the card to do so. Luckily it is the case and I just raise of 5x blind each time and everyone quit so I get their blind and confirm my hand over the game. Note: my semi bluff was with ace + jack and queen king which was pretty good card.
Here come the third draw, I got 2 kings. Seing that they started to get irritated about me raising. I assume that if I do it again at least one person will follow and since my hand is very strong I more likely to win or either not be out of jetons.
Here I put my 5x blind and the second leading the table call and another one also.
We got:
2 4 8 (no color possible). Since I see that the last one is on the verge of dying I decide to raise so he does all in. They both call me. So it is now me against the second leading.
There come a 10:
I call, he raise by 10x blind. Here I still believe that he got two of a kind but my two kings will beat him. So I call.
Last card:
I don't remember but a low card I believe with no color or no straight possible. It's only about two of a kind. I call and he raise of 20x blind and I calls up. I could see it was risky because he raised for the two past cards but I still think the odds are for me since 5x blind was a lot for him and I don't see anyone sane calling without high card and I got two kings !
He had two aces ! So I lost.

After this, he was the only one leading by so far as the rest was only surviving and we could never catch up.
My question is:
Would an experienced player would have done otherwise ? How so ? And how would you have judged this situation was too risky ?
#375
As said before, in my opinion the solution is sponsorship but who the hell would invest money in wa ? :(
Ouep, teubber et moi on tiens comme on peut en vie TdC. je suis heureux de voir que tu as un job qui potentiellement peut te rendre riche :p