the current rules are AFR, we can change it if enough people want to get rid of it

vote away!

I have always been one of the guys who always said no afr in shoppas, however, I think its important in order to be able to hide in a hard place and not just get ground zooked. There are weapons however where I do not think afr is neccessary.

Quote from: Dub-c on February 03, 2010, 06:31 AM
I have always been one of the guys who always said no afr in shoppas, however, I think its important in order to be able to hide in a hard place and not just get ground zooked. There are weapons however where I do not think afr is neccessary.

Aren't we talking about attackting from ground only if you wish to do it? It seems to me that you think that poll means only afr or no afr, without any exceptions.

I voted the 2nd option - no afr. Why? Attacting from ground is sometimes needed on my evil caven maps. But also, this would be more flexible to have 2 options of attack.

it's only a shopper omg no afr is best.. no need this poll, newbs startin playing shopper learn rules "AFR" they take it too serious , but in league it's other situation, not many of us picks it so i wouldn't mind if AFR 'd get deleted

NO AFR is more..... "fun"

imo shoppa without AFR loses all his charm ^^
I remember when i learned to play shoppa in wwp these rules:CBA AFR KTL were sacred for me 

"Some things must not change"

Peace

Surely AFR, but I don`t care if someone drills me from rope or from ground ;P

Shopper without afr is like sex witout a girl.

Quote from: xLo on February 03, 2010, 01:19 PM
Shopper without afr is like sex witout a girl.

Quote from: xLo on February 03, 2010, 01:19 PM
Shopper without afr is like sex witout a girl.

dont think thats true, but I also voted for AFR, simply because in most cases you can do more damage without attacking from rope more easily.
As an example I think of weapons like bazooka, or missilie/pigeon at some narrow hide, where you often can do max. damage with attacking form the ground, but from the rope it requires much more skill. Because its a common belief that Shopper is mostly a luck scheme there should be a many skill components as possible in this scheme.
(btw: OT: this reminds me, that I totally dislike the TUS Scheme as it is; the old FB scheme or the WO scheme [from the tourneys that FFie hosted] are much better imo).

I never understood why the AFR rule was put into Shopper in the first place. Always preferred to play without.

NO AFR!

Adds another dynamic, allows for a greater range of attacks, allows for accuracy on things like dyna drops to.

ALTHOUGH having the AFR does make the game somewhat more challenging as you need to make more time to set up attacks on rope and so need to rope faster and more consistantly.

i voted NO AFR and always prefer shoppers with no afr from the fb rules and fb scheme

most of the people who posted say no afr, but most votes are for afr

Clone Random00's post for me plz