Harpy was '500%' sure that my 1st turn in the 1st game was a cow.I wasn't convinced about that but however I let him report it as his win.
After the game I asked for darklord's opinion.He said it wasn't a cow.

QuoteUsing nades (in the picture) is correct.

I won the 1st game and also the 2nd one.So if it wasn't a cow then it should be my win,shouldn't it ?

Quote from: Csongi on April 15, 2014, 03:01 PM
Harpy was '500%' sure that my 1st turn in the 1st game was a cow.I wasn't convinced about that but however I let him report it as his win.
After the game I asked for darklord's opinion.He said it wasn't a cow.

QuoteUsing nades (in the picture) is correct.

I won the 1st game and also the 2nd one.So if it wasn't a cow then it should be my win,shouldn't it ?

look the reply no this photoshop pls
i no coment that more
https://www.tus-wa.com/cups/game-168142/

It explicitly says in the description of the cup what you did is allowed, you won that game. "1.1.1 The worm may fire the weapon if it is standing on the box with a pixel, even if it not standing on top of it [completely]? (that means he must stay on that box, if hes touching box from the other side than top then its forbidden)." It seems like the rule sort of contradicts itself in regards to whether the worm must stay on top of a box to use a weapon, but that's not relevant in this case.

even if it not standing on top of it
if hes touching box from the other side than top then its forbidden

ehh? I guess he meant not standing on top of it completely is allowed, but standing on the side of it is not allowed.

That turn isn't a cow so by rules you would have won this game, however I would consider more fitting that the game was replayed because you did only a turn. I'm not a mod, just my opinion

I didn't notice that game ended, so it's Csongi's win

It's a question whether the fact of a worm's contact with the weapon tile is decided basing on its in-game sprite or the actual collision mask (which is smaller than most people are aware of - it can be contained within a 9x16 pixel rectangle and its bottom row has a width of 5 pixels). The worm in the left picture is touching the tile with its collision mask, whereas the one in the right one is off by 4-5 pixels.

Quote from: barman on April 15, 2014, 03:42 PM
It's a question whether the fact of a worm's contact with the weapon tile is decided basing on its in-game sprite or the actual collision mask (which is smaller than most people are aware of - it can be contained within a 9x16 pixel rectangle and its bottom row has a width of 5 pixels). The worm in the left picture is touching the tile with its collision mask, whereas the one in the right one is off by 4-5 pixels.

yes, in left site of this pic he rearm granades but whit right site he go few back steps just look the replay ) LOL (most no look the reply and coments ))

Quote from: harpy on April 15, 2014, 03:46 PM

Quote from: barman on April 15, 2014, 03:42 PM
It's a question whether the fact of a worm's contact with the weapon tile is decided basing on its in-game sprite or the actual collision mask (which is smaller than most people are aware of - it can be contained within a 9x16 pixel rectangle and its bottom row has a width of 5 pixels). The worm in the left picture is touching the tile with its collision mask, whereas the one in the right one is off by 4-5 pixels.

yes, in left site of this pic he rearm granades but whit right site he go few back steps just look the replay ) LOL (most no look the reply and coments ))

Both of those pictures have the worm touching with AT LEAST 1 pixel, which by rule, harpy, means that you are bad at wfw and must now sit in the penalty box. 

Here's the exact collision mask at the moment the grenade was fired.

would it make more sense to make this rule for the worm sprite and not the collision mask... as u actually can see the worm sprite o_O

The rule is about the sprite.

yeah, it just seemed like some players were minding their head if the collision was touching the weapon box