[SOLVED] #31341

[Prankster]

i didnt remember how was that, but found this in the scheme explanation: "3 Fouls means a lose by default."
in this case, we (nW) "won" the game, because Creps cowed a lot. but its not important for me to report as we would've won it, just to be removed.

btw i dont know why ppl play classic league if they dont know the default rules of every scheme there...

[Rok]

I checked the replay. At the last "sitter", the grenade sat still for only 0.16 seconds, so technically it wasn't really a sitter, altough very close. Together with the first sitter and 2 shots which weren't reaimed (I'm not sure that's all, I fast-forwarded the replay) but also didn't do any damage that makes 3 fouls (at least). I think WC took all the penalties they were supposed to.

I'd like to see some other opinions before we take any action. That was surely a stressful game! 

[Prankster]

I'd like to see some other opinions before we take any action. That was surely a stressful game! 

thats sure! 
and sry WC, i didnt say this before u've reported, just didnt think about it when we were playing. thats why i dont want it to be reported as a win for us.

[DarkOne]

It's games like this that made me quit BnG in the first place especially creps' shots. Thouson, before you play BnG again with a clan mate who doesn't yet know it, please explain the rules before the game.

2 sitters, 2 penalties. Game should stand imo.

[Prankster]

only one of them was sitter technically, but there are some reaim fouls too,

[Rok]

The shots which weren't reaimed (there we're two, IIRC) didn't hit and they skipped a turn after at least one of them.

Game stands.