English
Home | Forums | Groups | Leagues | Cups | Tournaments | Challenges | Maps | Schemes | Files | Calendar | Donate

Stats bug?

Started by Turko, February 27, 2012, 08:45 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Desetroyah

#15
Quote from: Komito on February 28, 2012, 08:36 AM
Quote from: Desetroyah on February 28, 2012, 08:06 AMI dont understand what you're talking about :/

Overall points.

Aye, you're very right then my man. Tbh I love goals like that heh, it'll literally like an rpg, slow slow progression after hard work, but then again harder than an rpg since a loss bring you back 30-40games...damn


Kaleu

Well, except if you gain more points than normal now.



TheKomodo

Quote from: Kaleu on February 28, 2012, 05:22 PM
Well, except if you gain more points than normal now.

This is impossible, for what we are talking about lol. Are you talking about Seasonal? We are talking about Overall, with a winning percentage over 99%.

barman

Quote from: Komito on February 29, 2012, 07:49 AM
with a winning percentage over 99%.
Nearly* ;-)

The number of points gained by winning a game shouldn't be increased, it would be unfair to people who are not playing TUS anymore.
My WA compilation videos: 2007 2013
My photography work

Quote from: Statikbarman's fails are best

Peja

just to get it right, there are now ranks which are just unreachable?

i mean komos stats are insane, why shouldnt he be rewarded for that with the highest rank in bng?

TheKomodo

Quote from: barman on February 29, 2012, 08:52 AM
Quote from: Komito on February 29, 2012, 07:49 AM
with a winning percentage over 99%.
Nearly* ;-)

The number of points gained by winning a game shouldn't be increased, it would be unfair to people who are not playing TUS anymore.

I only count 1v1, not the 2v2 games, like I already said lol.

darKz

How about having the player with highest rating have the Elite rank and scale it down dynamically from that respective value? Genius? I know!

I do have my bright moments sometimes. :D
I remember knowing who it was but dont remember exactly what I knew
~ Dubc 2010

MonkeyIsland

I'm not home now, I'll decrease it tomorrow.
Due to massive misunderstandings: MonkeyIsland refers to an island not a monkey. I would be a monkey, if my name was IslandMonkey meaning a monkey who is or lives on an island. MonkeyIsland is an island which is related to monkeys. Also there's been a legend around saying MonkeyIsland is a game. So please, think of me as an island or a game.

TheKomodo

Quote from: darKz on February 29, 2012, 10:18 AM
How about having the player with highest rating have the Elite rank and scale it down dynamically from that respective value? Genius? I know!

I do have my bright moments sometimes. :D

The futures bright, the futures orange ! Aahahaha xD

MonkeyIsland

Trying 2500 for Elite rank now. (Decreased from 3000 to 2500)
Due to massive misunderstandings: MonkeyIsland refers to an island not a monkey. I would be a monkey, if my name was IslandMonkey meaning a monkey who is or lives on an island. MonkeyIsland is an island which is related to monkeys. Also there's been a legend around saying MonkeyIsland is a game. So please, think of me as an island or a game.

Random00

the ratio between single schemes annd overall is just bad imo.
and I liked the old ranks better then this ;s

Dulek

Having an elite rank at any single scheme was already hard in my opinion. Same goes to clans where only CF and cfc managed to gain 5800. I'd liked the old ones better too, expcet I don't mind increasing ranks only for overall at single league.

Desetroyah

My suggestion (just to sum up dulek's and random's):

- Return the individual scheme rank to how much it was before, but
- Perhaps turn the overall elite rank into an elite-rank-in-all-individual-schemes or something.

This way it will be reasonably hard to have (and maintain ofc) an elite rank in a scheme, but having an overall elite rank would require Elite ranks in all schemes, which is a huge challenge, and therefore a challenge worth having :)


TheKomodo

#28
I actually feel 2500 is about right for Elite.

I mean, think about what the word "Elite" means, personally, I feel you should have a winning % of at LEAST 90% to even be considered Elite.

Personally, I think it's shocking people with a win % lower than 80% can be considered Elite, they get beat 1/5 games, that's not very good at all lol...

I think Overall should be 80% to have an Elite rank.

I think the way MI has it right now is perfect :)

That sounds completely f@#!ing gay every sentence starts with "I think..."

Random00

I think 80% is Elite. For example, the world's best tennis players at the moment have winnings around 80%. Nadal ~ 82%, Federer ~81%, Dokovic ~ 78%.