Being an asshole to an asshole doesn't make you a nice guy. Whether he deserves it or not (probably does), you are
actively looking for his games/comments and picking on him.
Now, if you're masochist enough to actively seek annoyance, then you have my blessing. But you can't throw shit at him and then demand he be banned, because he throws shit back. At least not without looking like a terrible hypocrit.
You can browse through our posts, Uber:
- We never asked you to like Zippo
- We never asked you to be nice to Zippo
- We never asked you not to hate Zippo
- We never said his behaviour was acceptable
If you're going to complain about trash talk, then complain about
everybody trashtalking, because there are plenty of those on TUS. Besides, talking trash has never been a reason to flat out ban someone. cl2k, wl, fb, tpl, al; all these places would be very empty if that were the case.
And as I posted in the shoutbox: I would've talked to MI about doing something about Zippo, but then this little war had to get started again.
Yes, the warning was for requesting a ban. The people posting in that thread seemed to think it was a good idea, so I think we shouldn't spit on that decision by not applying it.
BAN
THIS
f@#!ING
IDIOT!
Please...
You're absolutely right, this is very polite stuff.
Again: we're not defending zippo's behaviour, but if there's a big group of people being like this, then we have 2 options: ban nobody or ban all of them.
nino, I
never banned anyone on fb. I never defended banning decisions on fb. Get your facts straight.
He supports zippo, while 4 out of 5 in the rest of the community does not.
No, I do not. I just don't want to ban him because people acting just like him are asking for it.