Popularity has nothing to do with it. I love roper. I pick it damn near everytime. But this scheme is f@#!ing retarded. Its people like you I'm telling to pull there heads out of there ass.

Who cares how many years its been played this way in leagues. The scheme is flawed. It can be better. Wall to wall has nothing to do with roper. The noobs who tried to copy w2's roper scheme back in the day f@#!ed it up! And you are all following it like its the gospel. It needs changed!

It's just a game, it's better than nothing, and SD is nice at the end, adds some spice to the flavour, if you are worried about being owned next turn, gotta try harder early in the game next time

It would be nice if we could find a perfect scheme, but quite a few of us have tried MANY different ways, and can't agree on anything, people either complain the maps too easy or the schemes 2 flawed, theres no happy middle because everyone has their own opinion of what makes a perfect roper game.

So I guess the reason why it's stayed like this is because so far no one has came up with anything better.

Johnny, you could arrange that before the game starts with your opponent, you are allowed to arrange certain scheme settings before the game begins as long as both players agree.

I will from now on. But I shouldn't have to. The scheme shouldn't have sudden death and it should have higher fd.

Why? It's fine the way it is, just don't play on ridiculously crate raping maps, and don't fall ;P

w2w SD has been in Ropers for at least 6-7 years now, the most part of WA's existence, I think that should tell you something...

But, yeah, you can agree scheme settings beforehand, and everyone's happy