Forums
May 14, 2024, 03:10 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - NAiL

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 100
46
Leagues General / Re: Checking times in RR
« on: June 26, 2012, 04:43 PM »
If you can't tell in game who won the game, without going to replays, then the scheme is retarded.


This is the whole point. In RARE cases you do have to check the replay to see who won, and in instances where the faster team appears to lose when they have actually won, checking the replay is mandatory.

47
Leagues General / Re: Checking times in RR
« on: June 26, 2012, 04:37 PM »
hmmm, it seems as though there is a lot of... confusion, in this thread.

Shy, you are right. Its a racing scheme, the top cumulative time should win. If the "faster" team loses because of an error in calculation then this is wrong and shouldn't happen, nobody can argue otherwise.

As for 1v1, its been measured by the second for as long as Ive been playing anyway, its what people are used to. Nobody is "moulding" the game to conform to the needs of "noobs", if anything, this proposition is breaking the mould from how it has always been.

End of the day Mab is right, people should be able to choose to measure by the 100th of a second if they like, ESPECIALLY in rare situations where the faster team end up losing if we only go by the second. Fortunately situations like these are rare, so to those of you saying "gtfo I cba to check replays every game", please don't say that because you won't have to in 95% of games.

HHC I am shocked by your posts. There is nothing wrong with wanting a more accurate measure of time in ttrr, ESPECIALLY when it could mean that you were actually cumulatively faster than the other team. There is nothing "lame" about this WHATSOEVER, it is NONSENSICAL to award the win to a team that were cumulatively slower than the "losing" team. This is the main point Mablack and Shy are making, and I dont see how this point can be disputed. To HHC and others calling this rule change "lame", please stfu. We all play this game for fun, changing the rules to make sure the REAL winning team is awarded the win MAKES PERFECT SENSE. It is not at all lame, and in no way whatsoever does it detract from the "fun" of the scheme.

It really irritates me when people say things like "you take this game too seriously". Hello? You play this game everyday, we all take this game seriously. You also made it seem like its a bad thing for wanting to be the best you can at the game and take competition seriously. Competition is fun, its great that people take the game seriously. Don't attribute "taking the game seriously" with an inability to enjoy the game. I take the game seriously... If I play a league game I take it seriously, I do everything within my power to win because ITS A COMPETITIVE GAME! If I lose... COOL! I still had a great time trying to win. Again, do NOT try and say that people who want to win are taking the game too seriously, this really bugs me and makes me facepalm myself and shake my head.

As for 1v1, we can see many people in this thread (including exceptional RR'ers) say that they enjoy draws, and there is nothing wrong with that. Its great when you have to play a game 2 or 3 times because you've both finished within the same second, its very exciting. Im sure most RRers (including Mablack) are still more than happy to measure by the second in 1v1, because having to win by at least 1 whole second adds a ton of fun and tension to the scheme. However if people wish to measure by the 100th, then they should state it in the lobby before the game starts, again, there is nothing wrong with this either. Im sure most RRers will still be happy to play by the second.


48
TdC / Re: Played my last game of BnG today
« on: June 26, 2012, 03:49 PM »
Komo, I think nail was doing sarcasm :).

49
Leagues General / Re: Checking times in RR
« on: June 26, 2012, 06:57 AM »
hmm after re-reading the OP properly I agree times should be checked in that scenario, damn! Im still for counting times by the second in 1v1 though.

50
Leagues General / Re: Checking times in RR
« on: June 26, 2012, 06:45 AM »
I oppose this rule. Sure, if we measure by the 100th of a second the faster team wins, but draws are half the fun of ttrr. Like Statik said they add excitement and tension to the scheme, definitely opposed with all my heart, as "draws" are fun.

51
TdC / Re: Played my last game of BnG today
« on: June 25, 2012, 06:20 PM »
Quote

I can help a little with some of game engine specifics:
The gravitational acceleration equals 600 pixels per second squared without LG and 300 pixels per second squared with LG.
There are 75 power levels, each one adds 16 pixels per second to the initial velocity.
A full power shot (doesn't matter if it's bazooka/grenade/petrol/mortar etc.) has an initial velocity of 1200 pixels per second.

lol, Im sure ill be able to hit any worm now I know this xD

52
TdC / Re: Played my last game of BnG today
« on: June 24, 2012, 04:54 PM »
I dont see a problem with notching, I dont see how it can be frowned upon as its a technique anyone can learn and it's an efficient way to predict shots. You can't whine about it when you can learn how to do it yourself, and I don't commend people for having an "I don't notch because im not lame" attitude. I've never bothered to learn how to do it because I don't like BnG.

53
Leagues General / Re: franz wins TEL season 9!
« on: June 23, 2012, 03:29 PM »
franz pwns, gj

54
TUS Discussion / Re: How an avoiding rule would work
« on: June 23, 2012, 02:42 PM »
deleted for the better good*

55
Championship 2012 / Re: "eac 2012" - Announcement
« on: June 21, 2012, 03:34 PM »
If its first come first serve, was I not the 20th player to register? How can you choose one player over another if its first come first serve?

56
Championship 2012 / Re: "eac 2012" - Announcement
« on: June 20, 2012, 04:22 PM »
I want to sign-up to the championship by accepting all conditions and rules. I will do my very best to make every game possible and I won't quit it before the end. I will be fair and will respect any other participants and also the moderators.

By NAiL

+ vn work SPW, great to see such effort and commitment being put into an event!

57
Leagues General / Re: sock wins season 25!
« on: June 20, 2012, 01:57 AM »
vn work sock, u pwnd her!

58
TdC / Re: Happy birthdaaay pejaaa
« on: June 20, 2012, 01:56 AM »
ohhh, hb young peja lad

59
Cups and Tournaments General / Re: More Tournament MODs?
« on: June 17, 2012, 04:31 AM »
I think people should be able to approve their own tourneys so they can be played whenever people want to play at any notice. Tourney mods also need more power, the power to remove/replace/add players being the main thing that immediately comes to mind. Maybe ill make a thread as ive been discussing it with others and they feel the same.

60
General discussion / Re: Cueshark vs Cueshark Jr!!!!
« on: June 15, 2012, 01:50 PM »
lol, "WAWAWA DONT WANT A CARPET BOMB", cute!

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 100