Forums
31
Off Topic / Re: Mug shots / Post your face !
« on: February 04, 2011, 04:44 PM »
agneau le roi! <3
Forums
May 02, 2024, 11:05 AM
News:
Leagues updated to v2.0
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
32
Off Topic / Re: Mug shots / Post your face !
« on: February 03, 2011, 10:36 AM »
Of course not... 
33
Off Topic / Re: Mug shots / Post your face !
« on: February 03, 2011, 01:31 AM »
lmao xXD
Dont get mad, it just looked as u have a wig on..
Dont get mad, it just looked as u have a wig on..
34
Off Topic / Re: Mug shots / Post your face !
« on: February 02, 2011, 07:07 PM »
Is that hair real Shy?
35
Leagues General / Re: Clanner point system.
« on: February 02, 2011, 03:21 AM »The Brazil thing was just a joke lol
As was mine.
Lol nino, stop being emo when i joke!
36
Leagues General / Re: Clanner point system.
« on: February 01, 2011, 11:58 PM »
I feel ya, we all know Brazil sux!
37
Leagues General / Re: Clanner point system.
« on: February 01, 2011, 10:41 AM »
Nobody "wins" here. We both ( + others) had some good points here, and its been like 5 pages without any yelling or namecalling, If anyone, TUS is the winner! 
"You wouldn't see in the Football World Cup for Brazil to turn round and say "Nah, sorry we are busy, can't play, we'll just wait until your best players are injured or something" lol."
True, but u wouldnt see them losing less points for a loss if their "weaker players" played instead! They are ranked as the best team in the world by many, but they cant play with a weaker team and then get easier off the hook.. THey are top of the FIFA ranking (at least was, i think its Spain atm), and EVERYTIME they play, no matter own team no matter opponent they still win/lose the same amount points at the FIFA ranking. That statement proves my point more than urs tbh Komo.
And the point u just said just says that avoiding is common among some clans. I can partly agree 2 that, but that really is more a attitude problem by single persons than the points themselves. They are not scared 2 lose so much points they are scared of the fact of losing.
Well, been fun! Ill get something 2 eat !
"You wouldn't see in the Football World Cup for Brazil to turn round and say "Nah, sorry we are busy, can't play, we'll just wait until your best players are injured or something" lol."
True, but u wouldnt see them losing less points for a loss if their "weaker players" played instead!
They are ranked as the best team in the world by many, but they cant play with a weaker team and then get easier off the hook.. THey are top of the FIFA ranking (at least was, i think its Spain atm), and EVERYTIME they play, no matter own team no matter opponent they still win/lose the same amount points at the FIFA ranking. That statement proves my point more than urs tbh Komo. And the point u just said just says that avoiding is common among some clans. I can partly agree 2 that, but that really is more a attitude problem by single persons than the points themselves. They are not scared 2 lose so much points they are scared of the fact of losing.
Well, been fun! Ill get something 2 eat !
38
Leagues General / Re: Clanner point system.
« on: January 31, 2011, 04:09 PM »
Ye ofcourse komo, i get the math in this long time ago! Just mentioned that it still would be a sick thing 2 do. lets say camper and me was on 1 k but met a clan with a v good ttrr rating 2. so we could actually have a total of like 1700 in ttrr rank. play a clan with like 800 in rr, but 2 of the players in the clan had won alot rr and rest lost. Then our clan with 1700 ttrr rank could actually win like 50 points if me n camp played, vs a clan with 800 in ttrr rank. Its just not right imo..
TEAMS ARE TEAMS! SINGLES ARE SINGLES! PERIOD! 
And ye, for clans with few members this would mean hell..
Just mentioned that it still would be a sick thing 2 do. lets say camper and me was on 1 k but met a clan with a v good ttrr rating 2. so we could actually have a total of like 1700 in ttrr rank. play a clan with like 800 in rr, but 2 of the players in the clan had won alot rr and rest lost. Then our clan with 1700 ttrr rank could actually win like 50 points if me n camp played, vs a clan with 800 in ttrr rank. Its just not right imo.. TEAMS ARE TEAMS!
SINGLES ARE SINGLES! PERIOD! And ye, for clans with few members this would mean hell..
39
Leagues General / Re: Clanner point system.
« on: January 31, 2011, 11:31 AM »
Like RoK said Komo, and i said it before; I get ur point.. !
Remember my rr example? So dulek/guaton plays 70 games win em all. Then me and camp plays 50 games and lose em all.
THe clans stats in rr would be 70-50 but our rating would still OWN With like 60/40 in win loss and still we would have a rating that doesnt reflect the clan at all.. Cause the rating isnt really the clans, its the individuals.. As in every other scheme. U wanna put the persons in the clan in the front line, while i wanna keep putting the clan itself in the front.
Anyways lets take a break from all this shit for a while, im getting dissy from all this!
Remember my rr example? So dulek/guaton plays 70 games win em all. Then me and camp plays 50 games and lose em all.
THe clans stats in rr would be 70-50 but our rating would still OWN
With like 60/40 in win loss and still we would have a rating that doesnt reflect the clan at all.. Cause the rating isnt really the clans, its the individuals.. As in every other scheme. U wanna put the persons in the clan in the front line, while i wanna keep putting the clan itself in the front.Anyways lets take a break from all this shit for a while, im getting dissy from all this!
40
Leagues General / Re: Clanner point system.
« on: January 31, 2011, 11:02 AM »
imo i given u more than enough evidence for it, both in maths and examples. anyways om glad we can speak maturly about the matter! +1
less points for noobashing? Its the opposite man! Imagine 2 clans; CLAN A pro clan, CLAN B noob clan. 10 players each, totalt of 20. As long as most players from both clans play u have countless of variables that will make the points go muuuch slower down than before. If the 10 players from the proclan all play and same with the noobclan it will take vvlong before the points drops down 2 "current" standards, eventho u wouuld play 50 games in every scheme.
In example ur clan just played 5-6 games in a row vd FD and won like 70 points. Cause the rating is what it should be atm.
Anways, im out now. Kinda tired of this discussion!
Peace my brothas from another mothas! xD
less points for noobashing? Its the opposite man!
Imagine 2 clans; CLAN A pro clan, CLAN B noob clan. 10 players each, totalt of 20. As long as most players from both clans play u have countless of variables that will make the points go muuuch slower down than before. If the 10 players from the proclan all play and same with the noobclan it will take vvlong before the points drops down 2 "current" standards, eventho u wouuld play 50 games in every scheme. In example ur clan just played 5-6 games in a row vd FD and won like 70 points.
Cause the rating is what it should be atm. Anways, im out now. Kinda tired of this discussion!
Peace my brothas from another mothas! xD
41
Leagues General / Re: Clanner point system.
« on: January 30, 2011, 04:03 PM »
lmao Komo. Yes of course the difference from 2vs2 singles is 1 little thing. The clan gets the points added 2 its rating, pretty obvious.
Man i played teamsports all my life, i never will support this. Imo a teamgame is a teamgame where THE NAME OF THE TEAM is what matters. Like when PS play CFC it doesnt matter who plays, cause the teams themselves are the main thing.
We have soo many individual leagues here, why make this one teamleague even more individual aswell??
ALso the "keep the current rating" is wrong and will only benefit the clans with most points.. Can u imagine CF with overall close to 6k gtting 40 points for each win vs clans as JEDI? For a long time it will be at least 30 + in all schemes vs all clans. their Overall will be 2 high in the end..
Nah, im with darkone. Ur clan has an extreme bng player (urself). They played alot of bng clanners, won them, got the rating. Now its up 2 the rest 2 prove themselves 2 defend it when ur not around, for their TEAM! THe honour!
In simple words: when playing singles, TEL bla bla u represent urself. When playing clanners u represent ur team. And the points of ur team.
Lets say dulek/guaton rr as gods, make ps get a sick ttrr rating (2200) and then those 2 newer rr again. Then me and camper plays the rest of the rr ever. We lose and lose. soon clans beaten us enough so when me and camp plays we lose 10 points or less. And still we have like 1800 in rr rating. THATS NOT REFLECTING THE CLANS RR SKILL, its dulek/guaton ONLY, not the 8 others.. The clans rating in every scheme is +- the average of each player, should be atlest. I earn my clan points in hyst, elite and t 17. Some earn most points in rope schemes. Still its the total of all our skill that brings in points and lose points.
Man i played teamsports all my life, i never will support this. Imo a teamgame is a teamgame where THE NAME OF THE TEAM is what matters. Like when PS play CFC it doesnt matter who plays, cause the teams themselves are the main thing.
We have soo many individual leagues here, why make this one teamleague even more individual aswell??
ALso the "keep the current rating" is wrong and will only benefit the clans with most points.. Can u imagine CF with overall close to 6k gtting 40 points for each win vs clans as JEDI? For a long time it will be at least 30 + in all schemes vs all clans. their Overall will be 2 high in the end..
Nah, im with darkone. Ur clan has an extreme bng player (urself). They played alot of bng clanners, won them, got the rating. Now its up 2 the rest 2 prove themselves 2 defend it when ur not around, for their TEAM!
THe honour! In simple words: when playing singles, TEL bla bla u represent urself. When playing clanners u represent ur team. And the points of ur team.
Lets say dulek/guaton rr as gods, make ps get a sick ttrr rating (2200) and then those 2 newer rr again. Then me and camper plays the rest of the rr ever. We lose and lose. soon clans beaten us enough so when me and camp plays we lose 10 points or less. And still we have like 1800 in rr rating. THATS NOT REFLECTING THE CLANS RR SKILL, its dulek/guaton ONLY, not the 8 others.. The clans rating in every scheme is +- the average of each player, should be atlest. I earn my clan points in hyst, elite and t 17. Some earn most points in rope schemes. Still its the total of all our skill that brings in points and lose points.
42
Leagues General / Re: Clanner point system.
« on: January 30, 2011, 07:37 AM »
u know u just wrote down what i meant,do you? :p thats exactly how 2vs2 singles work, altho here the clan also gets the score added 2 it rating!
The points u earn from winning games is calculated from the SINGLE players, not the overall at all, so its just what i said!
PLAYER A AND B earns 2000 points in ttrr. THen comes C and D and plays ttrr vs a clan with 0 matches so far. 40 poitns for both. Cause its the individual score. So its 2vs2 singles only in a different setting ,cause every player starts with 1000 points + the clan gets the scores added 2 their overall in the scheme..
U take the average points of the 2 players and combine them, just like in 2vs2 singles. BOTH players lose the same/win the same. If not how u gonna find 1 (ONE) set off points 2 win/lose for the clan.. ?
p.s Btw if we do this u know all clans gotta reset their ratings and overall in every scheme.. Some which taken "years" 2 build up. Sorry mac, still dont have me on this one! g`nite!
The points u earn from winning games is calculated from the SINGLE players, not the overall at all, so its just what i said!
PLAYER A AND B earns 2000 points in ttrr. THen comes C and D and plays ttrr vs a clan with 0 matches so far. 40 poitns for both. Cause its the individual score. So its 2vs2 singles only in a different setting ,cause every player starts with 1000 points + the clan gets the scores added 2 their overall in the scheme..
U take the average points of the 2 players and combine them, just like in 2vs2 singles. BOTH players lose the same/win the same. If not how u gonna find 1 (ONE) set off points 2 win/lose for the clan.. ?
p.s Btw if we do this u know all clans gotta reset their ratings and overall in every scheme.. Some which taken "years" 2 build up. Sorry mac, still dont have me on this one!
g`nite!
43
Leagues General / Re: Clanner point system.
« on: January 30, 2011, 04:14 AM »
But Komo, what u basically say is that u want a clanner system based by individuals. A "singles" system inside the clanner system. Really the same as a 2vs2 tus single, just that it keep its own score, and that we all start with 1k in rating in each scheme. It goes beyond my belief of what a team game should be like!
Imagine the noob-bashing in the start of this then. every clan are even. every player 2. First 2 play a "noob clan" 10 matches, woho!
I get ur point, and i see what ur thinking. i Just dont share ur opinion m8!
Imagine the noob-bashing in the start of this then. every clan are even. every player 2. First 2 play a "noob clan" 10 matches, woho!
I get ur point, and i see what ur thinking. i Just dont share ur opinion m8!
44
Leagues General / Re: Clanner point system.
« on: January 29, 2011, 03:31 PM »
Of course it gets individual when u use the players individual rating (which they earned in tus classic singles) and use that as a factor for points in clanners..
Imo this kills the whole teamfactor in this. Just like maciej said, it gets like a 2vs2 singles game, just from the same clan. I dont like this idea.
Also u have ALOT of strong players who never plays singles and this will just be unfair for those good players who actually are active in singles league. Lets not give players the same troubles for earning little points in singles, into the clanners also. This will just benefit clans with inactive players in singles and clans with active good players in singles will lose from it ( considered they win and increase their rating all the time).
A team isnt stronger than its WEAKEST LINK! Its a well known fact. As for cfc which mostly been a 1-man team in bng. Im not saying that its illegal 2 have it like that, but then deal with the consequences. Either get the average "bng skill" of the players in ur clan better, or just deal with it imo!
Alot of other clans have the same problem, just in other schemes. Maybe not as drastical as the cfc bng issue, but still.
p.s Just as a little fotnote: i said this in the ps forum and ill say it here.
WE WIN AS A TEAM AND WE LOSE AS A TEAM.
DOnt remove the teamfactor from tus, will be no team feeling left at all. Its a part of the charm in tus.
Imo this kills the whole teamfactor in this. Just like maciej said, it gets like a 2vs2 singles game, just from the same clan. I dont like this idea.
Also u have ALOT of strong players who never plays singles and this will just be unfair for those good players who actually are active in singles league. Lets not give players the same troubles for earning little points in singles, into the clanners also. This will just benefit clans with inactive players in singles and clans with active good players in singles will lose from it ( considered they win and increase their rating all the time).
A team isnt stronger than its WEAKEST LINK! Its a well known fact. As for cfc which mostly been a 1-man team in bng. Im not saying that its illegal 2 have it like that, but then deal with the consequences. Either get the average "bng skill" of the players in ur clan better, or just deal with it imo!
Alot of other clans have the same problem, just in other schemes. Maybe not as drastical as the cfc bng issue, but still.
p.s Just as a little fotnote: i said this in the ps forum and ill say it here.
WE WIN AS A TEAM AND WE LOSE AS A TEAM.
DOnt remove the teamfactor from tus, will be no team feeling left at all. Its a part of the charm in tus.
45
Leagues Complaints / Re: Game #52783 Information
« on: January 28, 2011, 10:19 PM »
Ye for sure. Remove this bull****!