WG was not able to play at the time we agreed

Zexorz told me he's waiting for a new keyboard to arrive, we will play as soon as he is ready.

edit: playing today evening.

reminder sent to profe & albino, 6 more days

Who host the game?

Whoever can. It doesn't matter.

Who chooses a map?

The hoster, with regard to the cup rules.

Who is will be judge the game (in case anyone tear off connection)?

The cup moderator.

And after I beat two noobs from my group what will happen after?

You get proceeded to the knockout stage.

I want to sign-up to the championship by accepting all conditions and rules. I will do my very best to make every game possible and I won't quit it before the end. I will be fair and will respect any other participants and also the moderators.

by barman

---

Passed.

Oh my, the amount of cringe in this thread.

- for a match there has to be two players from two clans online the same time

I never mentioned they have to be from the same clan.

- if you get a bad partner you don't want to continue playing with him

This is pretty much unsolvable, isn't it? Playing with a clueless or uncooperative partner is not something everyone likes to spend their time at, no matter if the pairs are random or pickable by hand.

Your concept would be basically just a mean to create new clans. So I suspect it would be just another "clanner league" that would die slowly.

There's a difference between 2-player teams and fully-fledged clans. However, I could call such teams "microclans" if you insist. Anyway, you can be in as many microclans as you want at the same time. You can play dead seriously with some partners and just have some fun with others. Opening/closing microclans is as easy as starting/stopping to play with a certain partner.

- for a match there only has to be four players online the same time

This applies to every type of a 2v2 match.

- if you get a bad partner you may get a better one next time. You don't have to play always against the same guys either.

I'd rather be able to pick my own bad partners than have to be assigned one

So in this concept pairs would be made permanent , right? Or what's the point having standings for the best pairs if you play every time with different player?

Yes, exactly that. You wouldn't likely play with different players every time. I'd imagine everyone would have a couple of favorite buddies to pair up with.

An example of how would such a league work:
A + B win against C + D.
A + C win against B + E.
C + D win against E + F.
E + F win against C + D.
A + B win against E + F.

2v2 statistics:
A + B: 2 wins, 0 losses
C + D: 1 win, 2 losses
A + C: 1 win, 0 losses
B + E: 0 wins, 1 loss
E + F: 1 win, 2 losses

1v1 statistics:
A: 3 wins, 0 losses
B: 2 wins, 1 loss
C: 2 wins, 2 losses
D: 1 win, 2 losses
E: 1 win, 3 losses
F: 1 win, 2 losses

If you know something about coding could you make a system I was thinking

Depends if I have time.